Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PolyMet Mining Corp POM.V (was Fleck Resources) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shaun M. Dykes who wrote (537)	10/12/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 708

So does the Pacific Ocean. What is your point? By the way the manner of reporting these drill holes is poor. What happens in the intervals between 25 and 35 feet, and 115 and 160.? Also, these are narrow intervals for the monster deposit you've been talking about. What is the dip of the zones? Are these vertical holes? For a professional management group they sure like to pull the wool. The copper equivalent is also very misleading as the recoveries for Co, Au, Pt and Pd in this type of mineralization are open to serious question. These constitute nearly 50% of the reported gross values. 17% of the value is attributed to Cobalt and at $25 per pound it's very doubtful that it holds this level for much longer. And what recovery of cobalt are you figuring on? And Ni? What % of the mineralization is in silicates?