Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (21074)	10/12/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: Sam Ferguson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

Dan you conveniently read selective verses from the bible to try to make sense of it. If it were possible to convince you the Romans altered the pagan myths and wrote the bible you would find fault with the truth because you were not there, nor was I. God is an abstract term that cannot be proved true or untrue by empirical thought. However there are many ways to prove that Jesus gospel brought nothing new to makind that had not been revealed before. Excavations in Egypt have carved in stone in pyramid tombs the same story of Jesus with the wise men, birth in a stable, raised Lazarus from the dead, was the bread of life, etc. These are over 3500 years old and the Egyptian book of the dead buried in the tomb teaches the same resurrection. The difference was it was an astrological Sun God and Luniology. The Romans were not aware of its true meaning and changed it into a historical fact. El Marcus was writen by a member of the Piso family. The bible even has their symbolism written in as a type of copyright. There was nothing in the story of the trial that was possible under either Roman or Jewish law. There are historical books of Roman law and the Jews still have their records of that period of history. The miracles are a lie. Jesus was never raised from the dead. I am aware the Romans changed Paul's mystical Christ to conform to the historicl Christ but failed miserably to cover it up. Your quotes of those changes mean nothing to me. Don't you find it strange that your bible is written in Greek when Jesus was an Essene & mary his mother was the colombe or holy mother in the Essene synagogue. Don't you find it strange that the Roman council at Nice decided what was God's only word? Isn't it strange Jesus warned us of the Scribes and Pharisees and yet their religion was carried over into God's word. Seems to me Yiddish would make more sense for a jew to use. The talmud sure wasn't greek. Why do you proclaim to tell people who is God and what his laws are? In your own word of God in the book of Hebrews the supposed quote of God's is written telling you not to do it? Don't answer any other thing in this post until you can tell me why you persist in this. Copy the covenant in your reply and go over it word for word and tell me how it doesn't mean you as well as others.