SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (9122)10/12/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 67261
 
In fact, your ridiculous statement above betrays your persona as a supposedly sane voice here.

Tee hee. That would be from Bill Vaughn, Mr. Facts and Substance here. Famous for such facts as Jay Leno's ratings as an indicator of public opinion about Clinton. As demonstrated in such edifying snippets as

No, the polls suggest that Clinton is the joke. At least that's how Leno and SNL are making their money recently. . . .

With presidential sperm squirting all over the Oval office and dripping on Clinton's head, as was shown on SNL last night, you still don't know who the NATIONAL JOKE is? . . .

BTW, I never quoted a real poll. That was your word. I merely told you Clinton was a joke, as evidenced by SNL and the nightly Jay Leno skits. Now if you want to make them a scientific poll, that's your free speech, pal. . . .

Sorry, I just realized that I need to talk in much simpler language to communicate to your type. What was the point of your last post? Is the point that the polls don't suggest Clinton is a joke?

That's funny. Leno's monologue ratings are the highest they've ever been.


A very interesting exposition of facts and substance in polling there, Bill. Very worthwhile, I'd say, not the least bit ridiculous. Sane and rational, as ever.



To: Bill who wrote (9122)10/12/1998 9:23:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
At the risk of sounding even more insane, Bill, I think my point was that ON THIS THREAD people have accused Clinton of being a mass murderer, among other things. (In my opinion, that is what is "ridiculous.") Others, ON THIS THREAD, have accused Bush of lying. You object to that. But why, I repeat, is it worse to make the second charge ON THIS THREAD than the first?

By the way, there is no need for you to be so confrontational.

jbe