Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : International Automated Systems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bottomfish who wrote (1420)	10/13/1998 1:43:00 AM
From: Jim Posey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7618

Barton, The significance of the patents is to protect DWM! Only time will tell if they have a product but the potential is unlimited if they do. If you want both sides of the issue then start reading from the first post on this thread. Paul McGinnis and several others have expressed the view point of the skeptics in about 1000 of the posts. Happy reading. By the time that you read it all, IAS should demonstrate DWM. Neldon's resume was provided in the quarterly reports several years ago. I don't have access to it right now. If I find it I will post it later. As far as the company making millions on paper, if no one was buying this stock it wouldn't be worth anything on or off paper. Somebody seems to think that they have something or the price wouldn't continue to go up. By the way, who called you about the modem? Jim

To: bottomfish who wrote (1420)	10/13/1998 2:09:00 AM
From: Jim Posey	Respond to of 7618

Barton, Here is the information that you wanted about Neldon's background. sec.gov Jim

To: bottomfish who wrote (1420)	10/13/1998 2:36:00 AM
From: paulmcg0	Respond to of 7618

[I need to read the view points of the skeptics and non-skeptics] The skeptical point of view is that there are both real world and theoretical limits (such as the Shannon-Hartley Limit and Nyquist's sampling criterion) that would prevent you from getting more than 56 Kbps in real data throughput (not counting data compression) over real "POTS" (plain old telephone lines, i.e. ordinary DS0 phone circuits.) But what do I know (besides what they taught me in engineering school plus 11 years of telecom experience).