SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (9163)10/13/1998 9:37:00 AM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Bill, re: <<So take your liberal highbrow crap somewhere else...>>

Temper, temper...

jbe



To: Bill who wrote (9163)10/13/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
As I said, the allegation that "Bush lied under oath" as president is a lie. That is the only fact that has emerged on this topic.

As Ronald Reagan said, facts are stupid things. If everything anybody says without legal or mathematical proof is a lie, then I'd wager that most everything posted here, and most everything written everywhere, is a lie. Me, I put more stock in what Lawrence Walsh has to say on the matter, even if he didn't make it to court. The only "fact" I recall you posting recently was something about Leno's ratings.

I did not say this lie was worse than some cockamamey story about Clinton being a mass murderer.

But of course such "cockamamey stories" are the stock in trade of this thread. Always on topic. And "who killed Vince Foster" is still a hot topic with Richard Mellon Scaife, even if the impartial, non-partisan American Spectator finally got annoyed when asked to endorse one smear job too many.



To: Bill who wrote (9163)10/13/1998 12:21:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 67261
 
lest you be lumped with the shallow Schuh.

Hey Im feeling left out.