Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ISSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. Nelson who wrote (4964)	10/13/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: Scott H. Davis	Respond to of 5211

Jim, others have researched the dealings of the owners of the holding company and picture is not pretty. I would not touch this thing unless the technology somehow got into the hands of a group with going concern management, expertise in the industry & funding. Not likely in this case. What we got out of ISSM management & their hired hypsters is a stream of partial truths & significant ommissions, and what where probably intentional misrepresentations as to the extent of the relationship/negociations with MOT, SG Th..... Scott

To: J. Nelson who wrote (4964)	10/13/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Brander	Respond to of 5211

Jim, it is a waste of time. I really doubt there is anyone left to talk to. ISSM is nothing but a shell at this point. Review the thread. Even when all the hype was ongoing, it was very difficult to talk with anyone from management.

To: J. Nelson who wrote (4964)	10/16/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: J. Nelson	Respond to of 5211

Well it's sometime and no board info. So back to the phone lines as numbers to call are a better source of info. There is intrest in high places from what I'm reading, yet this is causing a rining in one ear and a pain in one eye. That's the way it goes. Up one day and gains the next over a buying of greed. Heck the voice of Brokers and Shorts are strong aginst this one going back to a shell with 9 million shares open intrest IMO... That may be the reason for the cover or what looks like cover at this time. Jan 1, 1999 is very near. If someone wanted a year open start up it would take some volume to do that one. hmmmm intresting. Well back later with the "rest of the story" have to talk with Stan the man.... See ya, Jim....