Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (9206)	10/13/1998 2:40:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Do you really think women cannot be successful if they have children? What? Thats not what I said at all. I said many successful women are not married. A totally different thing. BTW, let me ask you something. Where does it say children are better off with a mother and father anyway vs. one of these "extended families" so to speak. Was it in the Bible and no where else?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (9206)	10/13/1998 4:03:00 PM
From: Charles Hughes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>>>Michelle - <<OT>> You need to meet more really successful women. Do you really think women cannot be successful if they have children?<<< A. Michelle is a successful woman. B. You are trying to debate something I know she never would have said, even without checking the thread. C. I doubt that you have ever had anything much to do with actually raising children, whether your wife happened to or not. If you were married. Because your ideas are representative of those with no practical experience in the field. BTW, how about single dads? Do you think their children should be taken away. Should they give up on any success if they choose to be responsible toward their children? Cheers, Chaz