Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (2135)	10/13/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Respond to of 12823

Thanks. At $3,000 per year, it's a little out of my price range!! thanks and later, leroyt Glad to see the information posted here.

To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (2135)	10/13/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: Doughboy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Spoke to someone who was at the Supreme Court argument. His read of the argument was that it went very well for the CLECs and very badly for the BOCs and GTE. There were two central issues of the case: the FCC's authority to issue pricing rules, and the FCC's unbundling rules. The Justices indicated that they were leaning toward reinstating the FCC pricing regulations, which will be very important for the CLECs like AT&T and Worldcom to get their entry strategy back on track. On the second issue, unbundling, the Justices didn't appear to show their hand. That is mostly because GTE's lawyer who argued for ILECs was all over the map in his argument and he wasted his time on irrelevant issues. Doughboy.