Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (9265)	10/13/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: Charles Hughes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>>> If one good is desirable, wouldn't two be better? <<< What's the point, if two aren't available? You appear to be in favor of divorce in situations where there is serious disagreement between the partners, short even of physical abuse (your definition of abuse is tendentious.) Obviously then, you think that sometimes one parent is better than two. That there are better situations sometimes (very marginally, I think) leads us nowhere. Peoples family situations are what they are. People seldom choose to live and struggle alone without reason. People seldom divorce on a mere whim. Even criminals generally prefer company. But you would deny people who have already lost at the mating lottery any compensation in the form of a child's love. How Christian of you. Chaz