Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (9452)	10/14/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<How's that any different from a corrupt police precinct captain in 1920s Chicago, keeping the bribes and kickbacks from the bootleggers up while keeping the number of gangland shootings down.>> We fought against that becoming an officially, accepted standard for that represents us. Some of us are still doing it. <<I knew he was a liar from day one. I didn't and don't care.>> There is a difference between not caring and condoning. You appear to be condoning it by supporting the continued existence of this drum beat, and the beat goes on. So what, you don't have to march to it.

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (9452)	10/14/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<Do I really care about the sexual behavior of our morally bankrupt leaders as long as my paycheck continues to arrive on time? Not a fig.>> OK, Capitalism, materialism, whatever. You are claiming that's your only issue. Some how I missed that on clintons platform. I can see why you initially didn't want him, with all the social programs he promotes. There are some other politicians who are much more dynamically pro-your issue. I wouldn't vote for any of them. Still confused.