SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : William Resources - WIM-TSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Dydo who wrote (1143)10/14/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 1326
 
Ok, gotcha - it was actually clear the first time. Here's the wording;

"The company has recently financially settled (closed) its gold hedges for net proceeds of $7.7-million (U.S.). William was hedged with put options and forward sales for its remaining 1998 and 1999 gold production."

As I read it, they closed them all out, they didn't roll them over to new prices or dates. I guess the put options they would have simply sold. As for the forward sales, 'William was hedged' - past tense. They don't give much detail, and I could be wrong here, but it seems clear to me that they are now completely unhedged.

Which is not such a bad thing, if only they could be assured of survival in the near term irrespective of PoG. But I don't think that's true, and I just heard a note of desperation in the whole thing, especially after wim's performance in September. The ENs and the Ks moved first, held their gains longer, and have better relative risk/reward. I dunno, maybe I'm just getting more conservative in my old age, but my bid for wim dropped from .10 to .07, on a smaller lot.

With spe, let's just let SB take the point -g- .......... cheers