Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: kphone	Respond to of 19331

You tell em ...... george You did admit you have a bad attitude ..... like we didn't know that already. :)) Did you say your best friend was sbennzer or something LOL George can I sign up for your email group..... lot's of inside info I bet.

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 5:52:00 PM
From: bob	Respond to of 19331

George: Here is another way They might think about conference calls??? That little green light on the monitor that almost everyone thinks is a 'power on' indicator is, in fact, a miniature camera that lets the federal government know which of us self-administer certain sexually deviant behaviors while in online chat rooms. This information then is fed into tax files, social security records, and baby-sitting profiles. All computer maintenance technicians know about these cameras, but they hold their jobs only because they have top security clearance. If they reveal the secrets of electronic equipment green lights (and more importantly, red lights), they know they will be stripped of their security clearances and relegated to the role of welfare recipient. (Currently, 27% of welfare recipients are former federal security personnel who have lost their clearances.) So there is no such thing as being overparanoid! Interesting factoid: Stanford paleontologists uncovered the planet's earliest conspiracy while studying coal and fossilized wood during World War II. For obvious reasons, the government suppressed these studies and only a few aged scientists can still recall this work. About 385 million years ago, when plant life existed on land but animal life was restricted to the marine environment, a species of highly intelligent, mobile tropical vine was warring against an intercontinental society of very leafy ferns. It was a battle of extinction vs survival and the vines were winning, overrunning everything in sight. A military tribunal of ferns and their various plant allies invented the Earth's first biological weapon. They cloned numerous species of OXYGEN-exuding plants and poisoned the Earth's atmosphere in the process. Lamentably, they could not shut off the process and reduced the surviving generations of plant life to a vegetative state. The shame of it all is that the adolescent vines of that age were very sensitive to the 'blackhouse' effect and reported it to their elders. The response they received was that 'there is an excess of paranoia developing here'. Too bad! Still,.... animal life on Earth would not have developed, had it not been for this biological warfare gone bad. So don't tell us to ignore our paranoid instincts. We have to pay attention to those clandestine federal taps in our computer monitors and to the green light minicams. Good night, all. And take care never to fall asleep with headphones on. They have been designed to record your dreams digitally and store them in microprocessors which can be queried remotely by automobiles passing innocently down your street. We don't yet know for sure who is behind this conspiracy. One theory says it's run by Cajun separatists. Another is that it's a Market Maker plot. LOL))) BOB

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 5:52:00 PM
From: Lee Bush	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

George and all: I don't seem to remember a spread of .015 for awhile. Seems things are getting a bit tight with the MMs? This could be an interesting week. Sorry the Tribe couldn't hang in there with us. George, are you hangin' in with us or not? Almost world series time! How many stockholders are there? Perhaps 500 or more. We all can't do that phone thing, but then there is the web site and good ole' SI. (No, I wasn't in the lineup.) Lee

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Grupo Brad	Respond to of 19331

George, I will try and be as restrained and mannerly as possible. Do you remember a phone call we had whereby you told me to xxxx off about 8-12 months ago. I called that night at your request and was in the process of asking you if you would "for a change" do a little "due diligence" on your own. You decided to make that reply (not me) and I have not spoken with you in any way, shape or form since then. IN FACT, you said take me off your XXXXXXXX E-Mail list also. You have asked, at times, very legitimate questions, and also questions with your negative spin. Now, DON'T tell me you have persisted in calling DCI to get your questions answered. GEORGE, you DO NOT do proper "due diligence"!!!! I know this for a fact. You can have the same and ONLY information available to any shareholder if you would take the time to do your homework. In closing, I will say this. You have been mislead in many aspects in what has taken place. That is your judgment to make and I would and never have suggested to people NOT to do their own "due diligence". POINT BEING!!!!!----"YOU MUST NOT RELY ON OTHERS--USE IT AS A REFERENCE POINT AND THEN FOLLOW UP WITH YOUR THOROUGH "DUE DILIGENCE"!!" Respectfully, "Grupo Brad"

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 6:22:00 PM
From: Parker Benchley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

George E., Just wanted to let you know..... I got on the conference call, I got on the conference call...neener neener neener! Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-haaaa!!! <GGG> George... Brad does an enormous amount of DD on a lot of things and although I appreciated all the information he was sending, I, like you, was really seeking information relating only to DCI. Therefore, I politely asked Brad if he would please limit his group email to me pertaining to DCI only which he graciously did. Some of Brad's information (although not informative to you) is hardly "totally worthless" to someone else. And, in the case of DCI, please lose that anachronistic "Good Old Boy" reference. Joe Murphy was totally sensitive to everyone on the conference call. He presented himself as a sincere, non biased gentleman and apologized (needlessly) for any comment or colloquialism that may have even slightly offended anyone. He demonstrated a caring, street-smart and erudite leadership towards the shareholders along with a nice sense of humor. I was left with a feeling of strong confidence in the man along with liking him personally. George, please take this constructively: You're a very smart fellow with a lot to add here, but sometimes I feel you don't examine your posts long enough to see how extremely rude they read to the person on the receiving end. When I doubt my posts, I just copy them to Word and wait for a day to send them. Many times, they never get sent. JMHO. Keep smiling George E. Onward, George B.

To: george eberting who wrote (9274)	10/14/1998 7:03:00 PM
From: Bruce Galpeer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 19331

george, As the leader of the GOOD OLE BOY CONSPIRACY THEROY NETWORK I have a few words for you and the others on this thread that were complaining. The first is that conference call was not set up for the good ole boy network. Yes, I was on it. But I personally know of at least 3 major, 100k+ shareholders who were not on the call and not invited to be on the call and that was just from my group alone. This call was, as Joe Medsker pointed out, mostly for new people and possible new investors. I am tired of your's and others complaining every time something does not go your way. It might be time that we dropped this thread altogether and take all of our findings to a private e-mail group. Did you notice how the price eroded after the complaints started on the board from this person or that about not having been included. There are MM's that look at public boards for this type of strife to see if they can stir up trouble and maybe shake the tree for a few shares. So it is my opinion that you and your type do all DCI shareholders a great dis-service by loudly complaining in public and using words like SEC when you complain. It is not illegal at all for a company to have a conference call for select people, as long as the information that is being supplied is not insider or in violation of the quiet period. I can fully assure you that Joe Murphy did not violate any laws or give any insider information away. I think that you really need to re-evaluate your posting and your holdings in this company if you think that something that wrong is going on. In closing, I apologize to all the rest of the thread out there but I felt that I had to get this off my chest. I hate to see people tear down something for no good reason other than they feel snubbed. Joe Murphy and his staff have done a tremendous job building DCI from an also ran to a PLAYER and I get irritated by others who just bitch to hear themselves talk or see their typing in public print. LONG AND STRONG!!! GO DCTC!!!! Bruce Galpeer - Leader of The Good Ole Boy Conspiracy Theroy Netwrok