Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Airstar Technologies, Inc. (ASTG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Christopher J. Plachta who wrote (3726)	10/14/1998 7:09:00 PM
From: Financial Internet Group	Respond to of 3967

Chris, I think the help Jayne was speaking of was spending cash and sending out letters for the special meeting. Three people have sent letters requesting the meeting, and it is just my family paying for the attorney. I for one do not believe that we are dead yet, we're close though. I am faxing all the shareholders a letter, plus two legal firms fax #'s and addresses. Cash is still welcome. We have all been used (except Jayne). Now, allow me to make a couple of statements. V is happy about putting "our" company into a chapter, he thinks he will be able to look for new employment and draw his $18,000 a month salary plus expenses. Well, I, for one, don't think so! Now keep in mind, Texas is where the work takes place. Dennis Casey is trying to get Sprint to hire him as their new agent to complete the work for the Air Force. I have a problem with that. He runs us into the ground and gets paid large amounts of money, then goes for another ride ticket. I think that is a big mistake. But Texas must have management or it will go into the shitter, who do we have? Wes will tell you all that I am pushing for the good guys, and that is not V. L

To: Christopher J. Plachta who wrote (3726)	10/14/1998 7:25:00 PM
From: Marie Newell	Respond to of 3967

Chris~ Don't you think the name calling is a little verbose? Unfortunately, if you would look at the facts, I am making a lot of sense. Whether Joe Lanza was a hindrance to the company, you make that judgement call. I have my opinion and I will not comment on this thread. He has been gone since May. When the Board of Director's terminated him, the shareholders should have rallied together and demanded a meeting, set some sort of due-diligence investigation in motion. But what they did is go in different directions which is what the Board wanted you to do. Joe Vigliarolo was a "Joe Lanza Fan" until he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Then all of the sudden Joe Lanza became the bad guy. Think about it! If Vigliarolo thought Lanza was great up until a couple months ago, wouldn't you question the turn-around? And also remember this: Vigliarolo told everyone, through his mouth piece Dal Grauer, that now with Lanza gone, your going to see the stock price move up and the company was going to go in the right direction. Problem is, no one bothered to ask Grauer what the right direction was. Then you had the investment group who was going to come in. What happened to that? Want to know? Vigliarolo wanted a nice compensation package to step aside and the investment group was a little wiser than most, they walked away. The error that was made is, everyone believed Grauer and Vigliarolo. No one questioned their motives. It is sort of like that 10-K that was suppose to be filed weeks, months or even a year ago. Where is it? Fool I am not-----skeptic I am. And I was always suspicious of Vigliarolo and I was right. Again. Jayne Lanza