SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (893)10/14/1998 10:36:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Respond to of 1722
 
[GM will soon resume $4 billion share buyback program -- CFO]

"General Motors Posts Loss of $809 Million"

By KEITH BRADSHER -- October 14, 1998

DETROIT -- General Motors Corp. lost $809 million
in the third quarter, mainly because of a nearly
eight-week-long strike that ended on July 29 and
crippled GM's production in North America, the
automaker announced Tuesday.

GM's loss of $1.28 a diluted share was slightly better
than analysts' expectations. The company's North
American operations continued to cut costs
aggressively, paying less for auto parts and making
factories more efficient. But Tuesday's report also
showed that the company had been discounting its
vehicles heavily in North America while its foreign
operations were beginning to suffer from economic
troubles overseas.

Auto analysts said that the strike at two GM auto parts
factories in Flint had caused so much disruption that
it was hard to draw firm conclusions from the quarter's
results. "The best thing about the third quarter is
it's over," said Michael Ward, an analyst at Paine
Webber. "Going forward, the news should get more
positive."

GM said the strike cost it $1.2 billion in the third
quarter, the same amount it lost to the strike during
the second quarter. Michael Losh, GM's chief financial
officer, said in a telephone interview that the $2.4
billion in after-tax losses from the strike should be
pared to roughly $2 billion by the end of the year as
factories continue to work overtime to make up lost
production.

GM earned $1.04 billion during the third quarter of
1997, or $1.34 a share, but those figures included
aerospace operations that GM has since sold. Excluding
the aerospace operations, the strike and a $271 million
after-tax charge for the disposal of some auto parts
factories, GM's profits fell 28.4 percent during the
third quarter, to $697 million, compared with $973
million in the quarter a year earlier.

GM's sales in the third quarter plunged to $34.42
billion, from $41.89 billion in the quarter a year
earlier, partly because some operations were sold but
mainly because of the strike.

Losh said that with the third quarter behind it, GM was
well positioned for the fourth quarter. The
introductions of new pickup trucks in North America and
the new Opel Astra sedan in Europe were expensive
during the third quarter but should start helping the
automaker's results, he said.

While GM spent an unusually high average of $1,732 a
vehicle in discounts in the North American market
during the third quarter, that figure fell to $1,400
for sales at the end of September, Losh said.
Full-sized pickup trucks require virtually no discounts
to sell, and GM had very few of them until the end of
the quarter because it was changing the design.

The weakening of the dollar this month may also make it
harder for foreign automakers to offer discounts,
easing the pressure on GM to provide large discounts.
"One of the things that ought to help us is the yen is
not 135 or 145" to the dollar, Losh said. The dollar
was trading at 119.15 yen late Tuesday in New York.

Financial analysts generally accepted GM's predictions
that with the strike more than two months in the past,
discounts might dwindle. "Once you get your '98 models
cleared out and your floor traffic back, then you can
cut the incentives," said Greg Salchow, an auto analyst
at Roney & Co., a brokerage house here.

Investors had little reaction Tuesday to GM's results.
Shares of GM fell 87.5 cents, to $51.0625, in a falling
market.

GM announced plans in August to sell or spin off a 20
percent stake in Delphi Automotive Systems, its huge
auto parts subsidiary, early next year, and Losh
reaffirmed those plans Tuesday. GM's longstanding
intention to wait until next year may allow enough time
for financial markets to settle down, he said.

The strike pushed GM's cash reserves down to $11.5
billion on Sept. 30 from $14.6 billion a year earlier
and $12.1 billion on June 30. Losh said that GM
expected the reserves to rebound soon to the company's
target of $13 billion. When that happens, GM will
resume the $4 billion share buyback program that it
announced in March and suspended last summer in
response to the strike, he added.

One of the sharpest tumbles in GM's earnings occurred
in the unit handling automotive operations in Latin
America, Africa and the Middle East. Mainly because of
the high interest rates and weak economy in Brazil,
previously one of GM's most profitable markets, the
division reported a loss in the third quarter of $64
million after a $165 million after-tax profit a year
earlier.

GM automotive operations in Europe earned $50 million
in the third quarter after losing $21 million in the
quarter a year earlier. GM's tiny Asian automotive
division made $2 million in profits in the last three
months after losing $7 million in the third quarter of
last year. General Motors Acceptance Corp., which makes
car loans and leases, earned $313 million in the third
quarter, virtually unchanged from a $312 million gain
in the quarter a year earlier.

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company



To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (893)10/15/1998 6:45:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1722
 
>>[Can a 1/4 point rate cut restore restore a financial system to
health via placebo effect? Would a 1/4 point rate cut in Germany have 10
times the curative effect as one in Brazil?]<<

It depends on how great the excesses are and how much of the truth we are being told about the status of the daisy chain of trillions of dollars of derivatives. We know the excesses are the greatest of all time by simply observing that everything in sight is being bailed out because not doing so would melt down the system. Even the Fed admitted that in its defense of the LTC strongarm deal. And the BIS has said that we were on the edge of a total meltdown twice in the last year. My guess is that a placebo can't cure this one. It's going to take more than interest rate cuts also. It's going to take luck, a lot of lying, and possibly divine intervention.