SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (66705)10/15/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:Intel reportedly shipped 24 MILLION CPUs in Q3

Where did you get this information?

Thanks,

Bob



To: Paul Engel who wrote (66705)10/15/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Pauleron,

Having spent 4Bn on new fabs are you telling me Intel just added 3M more devices per quarter.

What does that tell you.

Crummy designs with huge die sizes and poor yields.

Perhaps you can tell us how many more CPU's Intel will ship Q4 vs Q3. With no new products in Q4 and pirce cuts on 10/25 Intel may not increase much in Q4 revenues.

Meanwhile AMD will ship at least 20% more.

This is the reason Intels's stock is suffering. Huge fab investments yielding 15% capacity increase.

And a competitor with lower costs, smaller die sizes, shipping in record volumes.

Regards,

Kash



To: Paul Engel who wrote (66705)10/15/1998 2:34:00 PM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul Engel, RE; Intel ships 24 Million CPU's in Q3
If true, that's an amazing number. Total industry X86 shipments for Q3 would be 28 Million+.
And with projected growth, we're looking at close to 60 Million in 2H. Considering IDC forecasted only a total of 80 Million PC's W/W in 1998, that's pretty fantastic.
The thing that's interesting is with these outstanding shipments and the record breaking Q3 revenues we have lower earnings on a Y/Y basis.
And on a Y/Y basis the lower 1998 tax rate and the 12 months stock repurchases contributed 5 ½ cents to the ‘98Q3 EPS. (My calculations).
This may be one reason the stock isn't taking off.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (66705)10/15/1998 4:07:00 PM
From: carl a. mehr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,
That's telling him! We are cheering, hit harder!

humble carl



To: Paul Engel who wrote (66705)10/16/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: Kushi Kullar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Could we please quit the name calling and have a civil discussion.

Thanks...