Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: george eberting who wrote (9306)	10/15/1998 1:27:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

You call them good questions, and then try to change the subject. You have accused some on this board, as well as company management, of trading in insider information. Those are damn serious charges, as you well know. Please answer the questions. For your benefit and others, I will repeat them: 1. When was the last time you called DCI, not emailed, CALLED? 2. If you HAVEN'T made the effort to call and inquire, why not? 3. Further, if you haven't contacted Medsker and taken him up on his offer to arrange a conference call for you, and/or your alleged "list," again, why not? I will repeat my assertion. IMO, *your* credibility is on the line, not Joe's, not Brad's nor James' nor Bruce's, not DCI's, etc. Cut the crap about shooting messengers. Please answer these simple, straightforward questions. Ken

To: george eberting who wrote (9306)	10/15/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: Pr-Ac Man	Respond to of 19331

But once again, you "attack" the messenger.... Geeez, George. You are just incredible, and your ability to do exactly the wrong thing amazes me. You have the audacity to complain about being attacked, and then you turn around and broadside someone with information that has absolutely no relevance to DCI. I'm sure there are lots of DCI shareholders with mistakes in their past. But I could care less. It says nothing about DCI, and I see no justification for you to make these attacks. If you want to know why you're not being included more, you might try looking in the mirror. And I don't understand your reaction to the conference call. Joe Med provided a group of people with the opportunity to hear about DCI firsthand from the CEO. You have been told already that no "exclusive" information was given that you could not get yourself with a little effort. I didn't participate in that conference call, but I don't feel cheated. Just the opposite. I am grateful to Joe for all his efforts to promote this company. PA

To: george eberting who wrote (9306)	10/15/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 19331

But once again, you "attack" the messenger.... Not to get into a p*ssing contest with you, but I suggest you reflect upon inferences you convey towards myself. Personally, I'm not committed to DCTC either pro or con. But what has interested me is that I see a group of individuals whose opinions that I respect, expressing positive opinions about the company and management. Frankly, I don't need to explain my past issues since that record is for anyone to research here on SI. However, suffice it to say that I have NEVER worked with or for the securities industry (ie: I'm not a broker), and leave it at that. I'm not the issue here. The merits of this company, and the execution of its business plan, are. As for the CC, I certainly didn't get the sense that future business information of material note was discussed on that conference call. And I greatly appreciate the shareholder that coordinated it at his own expense. Regards, Ron

To: george eberting who wrote (9306)	10/15/1998 8:51:00 PM
From: ernie de la fuente	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19331

George, Please give examples of the information that you feel was "leaked to friends"! I assume you have concrete examples or is this only a hunch? I don't believe that any information has been given to these email groups that is not available to the public. Joe Murphy is WAY too smart for that. Just because a group of people have defined for you that "DD" is calling the company DOES NOT MEAN IT IS!!!!! Since "DD" is being defined that way and you seem to be excepting that definition, you are getting your feathers ruffled when that "DD" is retrieved without you. I view the email groups as an interesting phenomonon. They remind me of little kids collecting baseball cards. Why do I say that? Well, why would anyone list on this thread that their email groups are growing daily and site what appears to me to be exaggerated numbers on here? Why would anyone post on SI a note like this(paraphrased) "hey, I am going to write to my email group tonight with new info, are you gonna write yours?" Why wouldn't communication like that be sent via private messages or email?? It is intended to piss off those that are not included. Then the email groupies bitch when the whining you do starts. The whole process is a joke!!! This hubris the email groupies' leaders show may also be analogous to someone thinking the number of hits one gets on ones website measures them in some way. It is a form of pride or measurement or something. It is NOT A CONSPIRACY! Stop being the little kid who is never invited to play kickball when you never made any attempts to bring the ball nor gather the kids. Now, of course I am gonna have my head handed to me for this note but it has been awhile so I figured I would get it over with. The work that the Grupos, Medskers, Galpeers, JHA, Mexican Hairless....of the world do in gathering and INTERPRETTING information is AWESOME. They put so much time into it and seem to get little in return from many like you and me. Because they get little in return, it is probably normal to strike out at dissentors. I think a neat compromise would be for the whiners to stop whining about the "information" they don't get and for the email groupies to bring to a complete halt, any references to the email groups. That should be simple as the whole purpose of the friggin email groups is for them to COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL NOT SI!!!!! That will end the taunting of those not involved and hence maybe stop the needless wimpering of the others. I understand that SI is a great forum for potential new investors to learn about SI so I think we should all keep the petty shit where it belongs, in the toilet. Wow, that was enough babble for this week. EDLF