To: Bill who wrote (9619 ) 10/15/1998 2:46:00 PM From: Daniel Schuh Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
Ok, Bill, forget about your favored public opinion research methodologies, whatever that may mean. You want to get all literalist when it suits you to generate more "innocuous slurs", go ahead. On the substance front, what exactly was the point of your SNL/Leno emissions? I confess total confusion, as usual.No, the polls suggest that Clinton is the joke. At least that's how Leno and SNL are making their money recently. . . . With presidential sperm squirting all over the Oval office and dripping on Clinton's head, as was shown on SNL last night, you still don't know who the NATIONAL JOKE is? . . . BTW, I never quoted a real poll. That was your word. I merely told you Clinton was a joke, as evidenced by SNL and the nightly Jay Leno skits. Now if you want to make them a scientific poll, that's your free speech, pal. . . . Sorry, I just realized that I need to talk in much simpler language to communicate to your type. What was the point of your last post? Is the point that the polls don't suggest Clinton is a joke? That's funny. Leno's monologue ratings are the highest they've ever been. I have no idea what any of the above means, except as the usual kind of "innocuous slur" you're so fond of.You have no clue as to polling methodologies, population stratification, sampling errors, bias measurement, or results interpretation. Your idea of polling is someone else enjoying a joke on Leno or SNL. How does this correlate with the last bit above? Sorry, I just realized that I need to talk in much simpler language to communicate to your type. What was the point of your last post? Is the point that the polls don't suggest Clinton is a joke? That's funny. Leno's monologue ratings are the highest they've ever been. As for being out of my league, I'm happy to admit that one, on the "how low can you go" / "Have you no shame" front. The field's yours.