Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave who wrote (16570)	10/15/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Dave what is bothering me is the repetitive nature of your argument's. The majority of us look at IPR'S on Wcdma as Gravey. Of course that does not include Maurice. I beg of you to let the pony die! My ears are bleeding

To: Dave who wrote (16570)	10/15/1998 6:48:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Dave3 "It was similiar to Maurice's jab that I didn't know anything about IP Law since I didn't know that Jacobs' first name was Irwin (instead of Ira) and that I couldn't spell Motorola correctly." Sorry, it wasn't meant to be a comment on your IP law knowledge, just the specific strength of QUALCOMM's position. To understand QUALCOMM's IP position, you'd have to have reviewed the patents etc and have a fair understanding of the artisans' positions. Irwin is the core of it [and Andrew, Klein etc]. To not know them is impossible if you are familiar with the IP positions. Really not meant to be offensive - just critical and checking for how right you might be. Apologies for offense. [or offence, depending on your inclination] Mqurice