Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (9758)	10/15/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 67261

Who Me ....so she lied at worst...drop it now...GRIM Bouncer on Da THREAD

To: Who, me? who wrote (9758)	10/15/1998 7:59:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Who Me, you took my post literally and it was not meant to be. I dont know whether you called me a LIAR (in caps) or a Liar (one cap) or a liar (no caps) or a liaR or a lIaR or all of the above. Im fairly sure you have called me at least some of the above, or implied it, on many occasions, generally as a sort of attack-like defense where I outsmarted you. Once again, you chose to send me an ignorant message, which referred to Zoltans post, where you implied "thugs" were my kind of people, and that the democratic candidate was supported by thugs. Unfortunately you didnt read Zoltans entire post because it clearly says that a number of businesspeople - incl Andreesen - support the Dem candidate (Davis). You shot your mouth off without reading the article you were blabbing about. Thats what happened, and I called you on it. You couldnt defend yourself, so you chose to call me a liar. Heres a few references to the liar implication, which btw is totally unfounded: Message 6021083 Message 6027103 techstocks.com