SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (9767)10/15/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 67261
 
Are you going to give us a sign when you're not being literal, like a happy face or something, so we know you're not being exact with your statements?

Sure, when I make a statement like this, you can assume the following statements are not literal. (it just turns out that in this case, things were awfully close to literal if not completely literal. The issue you seem to have is whether you did in fact use CAPS when you called me a Liar! How ridiculous-anyway I added it for effect, although I suspect you have called me a LIAR but its not worth my time to look.)

Just a recap of the general Who Me attack plan - general term "conservative" used in reference:



To: Who, me? who wrote (9767)10/15/1998 8:28:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
..you're one....so's your mother...you're one....so's your mother....you're one....so's your mother....you're one....so's your mother...you're one....so's your mother...you're one....so's your mother....you're one....so's your mother...you're one...so's your mother..........................................................

WHO CARES?

Take it offline, you guys...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News