Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (55630)	10/15/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

Nope, if the figures are not accurate, than the figures you are using will sometimes work right in your formula, and other times will work wrong. And you won't have any idea which until after the fact.

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (55630)	10/16/1998 12:41:00 AM
From: Elroy Jetson	Respond to of 58727

It looks like those numbers did get transposed on my Excel sheet. Thanks

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (55630)	10/16/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: bearshark	Respond to of 58727

Hi Lisa: The 5-day ARMs is inconsistent in its signals when used in the typical way. However, I do use it quite a bit in a number of other ways. Remember the transition item I talked about in January or so? We had one of those this week and it worked. The market moved up before the 5-day could give a buy signal. It is now showing the strength of the buying as it did back in January, February, and March. I use the ARMs information a number of different ways. I also have broken down the issues and volume from the ARMs and have my own uses for it. I think the ARMs index is one of the most useful trading tools there is. I just do not use the 5-day version of it in its traditional sense.