SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Voice-on-the-net (VON), VoIP, Internet (IP) Telephony -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1579)10/18/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
Data Communications:Unleashing the Beast

The competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) have a $105
billion--and growing--local market opportunity. That's growing largely
due to rapid increases in demand for second lines in residential markets
and high-speed data lines in the business market.

Of course, that's mainly driven by the popularity of the Internet and
intranets. According to Strategic Networks Consulting, Internet protocol
(IP) traffic will consume more than 90 percent of global bandwidth by
2003. Of the 80 billion minutes of U.S. network traffic in 2001, a half will
be IP, frame relay or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), Boston-based
research firm The Yankee Group forecasts. Meanwhile, Cimi Corp.
opines that in the next century 80 percent of carrier revenue will be data,
yet data only will comprise 40 percent of network traffic.

In the pages that follow, X-CHANGE examines how the
telecommunications industry is positioned to realize that growth is a result
of the data communications boom.

Of course, the collapsing of communications equipment makes the move
to offer data services easier than ever. Vendors now offer multiservice
switches and other equipment that supports both voice and data, IP over
synchronous optical network (SONET) interfaces, routers and other
devices that support voice over IP (VoIP) in addition to bursty data, and
integrated access devices that allow voice and data applications to share
T1 connections.

A new breed of CLECs calling themselves "data-centric CLECs" or
"DLECs" has been born. That typically means CLECs--like Covad
Communications Co., NorthPoint Communications Inc. and Rhythms
NetConnections Inc.--that tie their own digital subscriber line (DSL)
equipment to leased copper pair from the incumbent LECs (ILECs) to
provide customers with high-speed access to the Internet or corporate
networks (see "The Slow, Steady Pace Of DSL"). Meanwhile, many
carriers are offering a variety of higher-speed links via frame relay, ATM
and virtual private network (VPN) connections. And many CLECs and
other telecommunications companies have purchased Internet service
providers (ISPs) to offer Internet access, web hosting and more (see
"Searching for Value").

At the same time, the incumbent telcos are stepping up their data
communications services activities, and cable companies are pushing
high-speed cable modem services to new markets (see "Leader of the
Pack").

With everyone moving into one another's lines of business--and more
carriers coming to market--there's a greater need than ever to differentiate
while controlling costs.

Today carriers with private IP networks ensure packet delivery by
over-provisioning bandwidth on those networks, which is the expensive
way to do it. Carriers need to deliver new revenue-generating services
while at the same time constraining their costs, so they can reap the profits
of these new services.

That's already starting to happen as a result of integrated access and
VPNs. And vendors are beginning to deliver a variety of equipment
designed to deliver personalized network services as customers and their
applications demand it (see "Chasing An Opportunity").



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1579)10/18/1998 11:29:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
Leader of the Pack While Still Not Ubiquitous, Cable Modems' Speed, Deployment Far Surpass DSL



The hype machines are in overdrive promoting
the best technology and carriers' strategies to
get broadband access into the home. While
most believe that integrated services digital
network (ISDN) has gone the way of the
dinosaur, some new species of high-speed
data transmission methods are evolving. The
two prime contenders in the battle to win the
business of residential users seeking a faster,
direct path to the Internet are digital subscriber
line (DSL) and cable modems. At this early point in the game, cable
modems are way ahead of the pack.

"Cable wins on price, performance and availability," says Andrew Davis,
a market analyst for the Tempe, Ariz.-based consultancy Forward
Concepts Co. "Broadband Access in the Local Loop '98," a report by
Forward Concepts, predicts that cable modems will dominate DSL for
residential broadband access well into the future. (See chart, "North
American Residential Broadband Access.") For-ward Concepts predicts
that by the end of 1998, there will be about 360,000 cable modem
subscribers, growing to 1.2 million by the end of 1999, 3.4 million in
2000 and eventually reaching about 9.6 million by 2003.

Incumbent telcos and some competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs)
are banking on DSL services, which can run at speeds of up to 8
megabits per second (mbps) downstream and 1mbps upstream over
existing copper phone lines, to reign supreme. Then there are the cable
companies, which are upgrading their systems to two-way hybrid
fiber/coaxial (HFC) cable, which allows users to connect to the Internet at
peak speeds of 10,000 kilobits per second (kpbs).

By the end of this year, only about 18 percent of North America's 11,000
cable systems will be equipped for two-way HFC, Davis says. Progress
in deploying cable modem service may be slow, but it's surely outpacing
DSL offerings. With more than 350,000 cable modem users anticipated
by the end of the year, "that's a factor of 10 over DSL," says Michael
Harris, president of Kinetic Strategies Inc., a Phoenix-based Internet
research company. Most of the major cable operators, such as Time
Warner Cable and MediaOne Group, plan to have all of their systems
upgraded by the end of 2000.

Cost to consumers is another issue that sets cable modem service apart.
While pricing for residential DSL offerings still is being developed,
industry observers note that initial commercial rollouts will cost customers
about $70 a month. Cable modem service, on the other hand, typically
costs between $29 to $45 a month, depending on whether customers buy
or rent the modem, or subscribe to the cable company's video services.

Cable modem vendors report large increases in the amount of the
modems they are shipping. In 1997, only about 190,000 modems were
distributed by all vendors, according to Kinetic Strategies. Kinetic
projects this year vendors will ship about 550,000 two-way cable
modems in North America, and top 1 million by 1999 as
industry-standard modems begin to hit the shelves at retail stores.
Motorola Multimedia Group alone has sent out 170,000 modems since
the beginning of the year, according to Gary Granger, the group's director
of marketing. Another major vendor, Bay Networks Inc. (which
purchased cable modem pioneer LAN City), has shipped a total of
200,000 modems.

Despite the fact that cable companies are adding about 1,000 new
subscribers a day, penetration rates in markets where cable modem
service is offered are dishearteningly low. At mid-year 1998, there were
only about 250,000 cable modem subscribers, even though the service
was available to more than 12 million homes, Kinetic Strategies reports.
(See chart, "U.S. Commercial Cable Modem Launches.")

"The low 'take rates' experienced by the cable companies remains one of
the significant flies in the broadband ointment," according to the Forward
Concepts report. The typical penetration rate is about 2 percent to 3
percent because cable companies are rolling out the service on a
node-by-node basis and limiting their marketing until the entire system is
cable modem-ready.

Image: U.S. Commercial Cable Modem Launches

But to be profitable, penetration rates need to be on the order of 10
percent to 15 percent, Davis says. RoadRunner, an Internet service
provided in the cable franchises of Time Warner Cable and MediaOne, is
slowly getting close to those levels. The service reports that its penetration
rates are about 2 percent after one year in a market. Of the 30 or so
markets where RoadRunner service is offered, 11 have more than 6
percent penetration, with three of those 11 hitting the 9 percent mark.

Part of the reason for limited cable modem service rollout and low
penetration rates is that cable companies don't want to end up like
America Online Inc. (AOL), which attracted so many new customers so
quickly that its network couldn't keep up with the demand. "Cable
companies don't want to oversubscribe their network, so they're moving
slowly," Davis adds.

Industry watchers say there are a couple of factors limiting the acceptance
of cable modems. For one, there's not yet enough broadband content on
the World Wide Web. Secondly, most residential Internet users seem to
be satisfied with the speed of dial-up connectivity for a $19.95
all-you-can-eat price. So consumers may not yet see much benefit in
spending upwards of $30 a month to connect to the Internet, industry
analysts believe.

But once potential customers see the speed, they see more value in the
cable modem service. "It's a highly visual sale. People have to see it to
want to buy it," Harris says.

For that reason, cable companies' primary marketing efforts have been
hands-on demonstrations. "We noticed that people needed to see the
speed," says Tom Nagle, director of data services at Cox
Communications Inc. As Cox begins providing cable modem service in its
markets, it does live demonstrations of the technology at shopping mall
kiosks or in tents at community events. "There are education issues," he
adds.

Nagle also notes that cable companies have to answer questions about
why the service is better than dial-up, and address reliability issues not
only because of cable's tarnished history of video outages, but because
cable modems are a new technology.

Along the same line, @Home Network, a distributor of high-speed
Internet services, and its technology partner Cisco Systems Inc. have
taken their show on the road to shopping malls across America. The
"Cable Internet Revolution Expo" will visit 12 cities to show consumers
the apparent benefits of using high-speed, dedicated Internet services.
The expo will be promoted by some of @Home's 17 cable partners,
including Cox, Comcast Corp. and Cablevision Systems Corp.

Hands-on marketing isn't the only thing cable companies are relying on to
spur growth of cable modem acceptance by consumers. The industry also
is in the process of completing the standardization of modem technology.
Once this process is complete later this fall and the new modems hit the
market, cable companies won't have to be saddled with debt from the up
front capital required to buy proprietary modems.

"The modem is a large up front cost for us," says Joe Waz, vice president
of external affairs at Comcast. The company pays its vendor, Motorola,
about $300 per modem, then leases the hardware to customers. "We're
not encouraging customers to buy the modem now," he adds, noting that
once standard modems are available, consumers will be able to buy their
own at potentially lower prices. While modems initially may cost about
$300 in the retail environment, many industry executives believe the price
will fall to about $200 within the next year or two.

The "Broadband in the Local Loop '98" report notes that standards,
which will allow modems to work no matter the service provider, not only
will drive the costs down, but also will allow broadband modems to
follow distribution channels--such as retail electronics stores or within a
personal computer (PC) equipment package--that have proven successful
in the computer and communications industries.

While there are several cable companies offering Internet service
independently, a majority of carriers have aligned with one of the two
major cable Internet service and content providers: @Home or
RoadRunner, which was created by Time Warner. Currently @Home
brings Internet access to 17 cable company partners, while RoadRunner
provides services to the systems served by Time Warner Cable and
MediaOne.

Among the partners of @Home are Comcast, Cox, Jones Intercable Inc.
and future AT&T Corp. company Tele-Communications Inc. (TCI). Cox
is perhaps one of the earliest providers of cable modem service. It began
its service in 1993, in conjunction with Prodigy, using Zenith cable
modems in San Diego. In 1996 Cox became one of the founders of
@Home and began offering service in Orange County, Calif. Cox now
provides cable modem services to about 30,000 homes in eight markets
including Orange County; San Diego; Phoenix; Norfolk, Va.; Providence,
R.I.; Oklahoma City; Omaha, Neb.; and Meriden, Conn. Nagle says that
service will begin in New Orleans by the end of 1998 using the new
industry standard modems.

Currently Cox's @Home offering costs $44.95, including modem rental
and installation, or $29.95 when the customer purchases the modem
outright. Cox sells the Bay Networks modem for $399. The Motorola
modem costs $340.

Comcast first began offering its service in the spring of 1997 in Sarasota,
Fla. Cox now provides service to 25,000 customers in six more markets,
including Baltimore; Howard County, Md.; Philadelphia; Union and Essex
counties, N.J.; and the Detroit suburbs. Cox will have cable modem
service in another four markets by end of this year, but declined to say
which ones. Cost of service ranges from $39.95 to $49.95, depending on
whether the customer subscribes to Cox's video service.

Jones initially started its own Internet service, the Jones Internet Channel,
in the Virginia cities of Alexandria and Dale City. But, as a result of a
lawsuit with one of its strategic partners, Jones recently opted to partner
with @Home. With the Jones Internet Channel, the carrier secured 4,000
cable modem customers from its base of 450,000 video customers, says
Jim O'Brien, president of Jones Intercable. O'Brien adds that Jones is
now converting its current customers to @Home, and will expand into
other markets in 1999.

Pricing for the Jones' @Home service has not been finalized, but O'Brien
says he expects it to be in line with the $49.95 that Jones charged for the
Internet Channel. Jones also is considering giving discounts to customers
who purchase packages of its video, phone and Internet services.

TCI has operations throughout California, as well as in Hartford, Conn.;
Denver; the Texas towns of Garland, McKinney and Stonebridge;
Arlington Heights, Ill.; Seattle; and East Lansing, Mich. The company,
however, did not return requests for interviews about future cable modem
deployment plans.

The RoadRunner Internet service initially was founded to provide access
and content to Time Warner Cable. In December 1997, Time Warner
joined forces with MediaOne, which had operated its own service called
MediaOne Express since 1995. Time Warner says that some other,
unidentified independent cable companies are in discussions about joining
the Road-Runner alliance. Time Warner is using Motorola modems in its
systems throughout Ohio; upstate New York; San Diego; Tampa Bay,
Florida; Oahu, Hawaii; and Memphis, Tenn. Toshiba modems are being
used in Portland, Maine and El Paso, Texas. The service costs between
$35 and $45 a month. MediaOne offers high-speed data services
throughout its territory, using Bay Networks modems. Markets served
include suburban Boston; Chestnut Hill, Mass.; Salem, N.H.; suburban
Detroit; Ann Arbor, Mich.; Chicago; Atlanta; Jacksonville, Fla.; Broward
and Dade counties, Fla.; and Los Angeles. Together, Time Warner and
MediaOne hope to have all of their systems upgraded by the end of
2000, passing 27 million homes that could potentially buy their cable
modem service.



To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1579)10/22/1998 6:41:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Respond to of 3178
 
Turn Your Enterprise Network Into a PBX With Selsius Systems' VoIP Solution

October 22, 1998

NETWORK COMPUTING via NewsEdge Corporation : There's no shortage of H.323 point-solution products for network managers to consider, from end-user telephony products, such as Microsoft NetMeeting, to hardware-based gateways, such as Ascend Communications' MAX. However, only Selsius Systems offers a full product suite providing end-to-end connectivity services; the sum of the parts is a fully functional virtual PBX on your existing LAN.

The Selsius line is quite broad. Its best-known components are its Ethernet telephones, which use firmware-based codecs (coder/decoders) to bring high-quality VoIP (voice over IP) all the way to the desktop. Selsius also offers a line of H.323 gateways with analog, T1 and PRI interfaces, letting you connect Ethernet phones to the outside world, as well as a reverse gateway that provides H.323 interfaces to fax machines and other traditional telephony gear. Rounding out the suite is a software-based call-management system that provides extension management, call setup and routing, and more, combining all the products into a distributed, virtual PBX.

We tested a handful of Selsius Systems' 12-button speaker- phones and software-based virtual phones, a dual-line analog gateway and call-management software. After using it as our main business telephony gear for two months, we found the solution to be more than adequate, though it has some annoying idiosyncracies.

Advanced Features We were most impressed by the Selsius solution's support for business-class telephony services such as hold, transfer, distinctive rings, Caller ID and call forwarding. These features clearly separate Selsius from the rest of the herd; no competing vendor offers these services in an H.323-compliant form. In fact, no other vendor offers an H.323-compliant end-to-end solution, much less one that offers advanced services. And of those vendors that offer point solutions, none has products that feature anywhere near the depth of the functions Selsius provides.

Taken together, Selsius' range of products and comprehensive features make deploying VoIP on your network not just feasible, but desirable. Although some rough edges must be smoothed out, the Selsius products live up to the promise of IP-centric telecommunications. In particular, they provide a good solution for small-to-medium-sized networks where network utilization is not a great concern and where a fully featured PBX does not already exist.

Selsius is a division of Intecom, a well-known PBX vendor, so support for advanced telephony features is not surprising; that the products' support for native IP services is equally well-designed is more of an eye-opener. All system configuration is handled through a Web browser; the phones and gateways use DHCP to determine their IP addresses and TFTP to download their specific configurations, rather than requiring each unit to be programmed by hand.

The products also make extensive use of the IP ToS (type of service) byte, providing built-in prioritization and ToS services. By default, the phones and gateways set a precedence of "3" and enable the "low-latency " ToS flag on all RTP/UDP (Real-time Transport Protocol/User Datagram Protocol) traffic, allowing network managers to implement ToS-based routing for the units. Currently, there are no mechanisms for overriding these values, though this should not be an issue for most networks. (For more information on ToS, see "Implementing Prioritization on IP Networks," www.networkcomputing.com/915/915ws1.html.) Many networking companies don't even provide such services in their offerings, so support for these features is a pleasant surprise.

Apart from supporting basic IP services, Selsius also does a good job of managing bandwidth usage, incorporating noise-suppression technology in its phones and gateways. While this keeps background noise from generating unnecessary traffic, the feature can also work against you. Some people speak too softly, and their low decibel levels result in parts of the conversation being lost as the noise suppression kicks in. Having to ask the other party to speak up gets annoying quickly, though to be fair, this only happens on rare occasions. In addition, the Selsius gear doesn't generate background " comfort sounds," so whenever the noise suppression kicks in there is a dead silence that we found somewhat awkward.

Selsius is also on top of codec support, with strong G.711 and G.723 implementations. Most noticeably absent is support for G.729, a low-bandwidth codec favored by many of the other H.323 gateways on the market. This is perhaps the biggest hurdle for integrating the Selsius gear into a mixed-vendor environment, though this shortcoming should be addressed by the end of this year, according to the vendor. Selsius' frame-generation rate was also pretty good, with utilization ranging between 20 and 130 packets per second, depending on the speaker's volume and steadiness, and other environmental factors.

Overall, this is a technically sound solution, though it could stand some minor improvements. It is not ready for enterprisewide deployment, but it is certainly suitable for trial usage in small or medium installations. In particular, users of modern PBX equipment will not be impressed with the Selsius solution's feature set, which is very much a work in progress. Nor do we believe that most of the data networks in use in large corporations can handle the traffic of widespread VoIP deployment. But small-to-medium-sized companies that do not face these issues can deploy it comfortably, as can organizations with small branch offices or isolated networks.

The CallManager The heart of the Selsius IP-PBX suite is the NT-based CallManager software. In particular, the CallManager acts as the central management console for Selsius devices, and is used for configuring a phone's extension numbers and function buttons, routing plans for the gateways and other system features. It also provides call-management services for all Selsius devices on the network, and lets you integrate H.323 products into the virtual PBX setup.

The CallManager's interface is a collection of Active Server Pages (ASP) running on Microsoft's Internet Information Server (IIS), with management tasks handled through a Web browser on the user side, and configuration data stored in a Microsoft Access file on the server's drive. Overall, the configuration process is fairly straightforward and easy-to-understand, though we did encounter various ASP script errors on a server that had many other services running on it.

In our case, we found that the tight integration with IIS was a problem, since we could not run the software on the system of our choice (due to the ASP errors), and were unable to use another Web server (such as Netscape's FastTrack) for the configuration services. Indeed, almost all of Selsius' advanced features are tightly linked to a Microsoft service in one form or another. Even the free voicemail server that comes with the CallManager uses MAPI profiles on the host NT Server to route voicemail messages to different e-mail accounts (rather than just using SMTP).

Once these issues were resolved, we found the configuration services quite clear and easy to use. We were able to define extension numbers for each of the Selsius Ethernet phones, as well as for the various H.323 software in use on our network. We were also able to design call-routing plans easily, incorporating wild cards and dialing-string management strategies. Using this setup, all of our local devices were assigned four-digit extensions, while the dialing pattern of "9@" was established as a routing plan for the analog gateway. Users could dial any four-digit extension, or could place outbound calls simply by dialing "9" and any telephone number.

Besides the configuration services, the CallManager also provides basic connectivity and call-routing services to the devices on the network, acting as a proxy among these devices, including both the Selsius equipment and H.323 nodes. Whenever a call between two devices is placed, the call setup is negotiated through the CallManager. Calling systems pass dial strings and commands to the CallManager, which locates the destination and then passes along the request(s). Once the call has been negotiated with both end points, all subsequent voice traffic passes directly between the two systems, though subsequent command traffic is passed through the CallManager.

This proxy design works quite well, and adds to the overall functionality of the system. For example, if an H.323 client (such as Microsoft's NetMeeting) wants to call a user with a Selsius phone, it passes the destination system's extension number to the CallManager, which then attempts to contact the destination on behalf of the calling system. If the destination device is busy, the CallManager could return a "busy" signal, or could forward the call to the voicemail inbox associated with the destination, depending on how the destination device is configured. Without this middleman service, none of these advanced features would work.

However, not everything is rosy, mostly because of problems with the state of most H.323 implementations. For example, while a Selsius phone can issue a "hold" request to the gateway, which will then forward the request to the destination system, the end node may not understand the request and will likely drop the call. This was typical of the interoperability issues that we found in our tests, with NetMeeting clients and Cisco gateways dropping calls whenever any sort of advanced functionality was attempted. Although we were able to integrate the H.323 devices into the CallManager's extension pools and routing plans, with non-Selsius products we were unable to do much beyond placing calls, as any greater level of interoperability between H.323 systems is virtually nonexistent.

The Phones Perhaps the most interesting part of the Selsius IP-PBX suite is the phones. These units have the same look and feel as regular multiline handsets, but have 10BASE-T Ethernet ports instead of RJ-11 phone jacks. A variety of units is available, ranging from a 30-button console to a plain 12-button handset. Selsius also has a software-based phone that can be used in lieu of NetMeeting (or in conjunction with it) for tight integration at the desktop. Button assignments include features such as "hold" and " transfer," as well as programmable speed-dial entries, message checking and other typical business-class telephony services.

Each of the hardware-based phones has a full-blown IP stack, a dedicated processor and on-board codecs, which provides exceptional voice quality, very low latency and high reliability. However, these features come at a fairly steep price, ranging from $550 for the 30-button console to $375 for the base 12-button unit. Although these prices are in line with the digital multiline feature phones we've seen ship with most PBX systems, they are considerably higher than the analog handsets you can get for $20 at a flea market.

Also, there are some issues that arise if you put an Ethernet phone on every desk, requiring multiple Ethernet drops to each office. If you do not have two sets of CAT-5 wiring running into every office, you will need to do some planning. Although the phones come with two Ethernet ports-providing the ability to downstream a PC's Ethernet connection off the back of the handset-those ports are fixed at 10 Mbps, meaning you'll need a separate Ethernet run if your desktop PCs have 100-Mbps adapters. Furthermore, the phones do not support 802.1Q VLAN tagging and prioritization services, restricting their ability to provide these services to downstream Ethernet devices.

Our experience indicates that these phones should be used on a separate LAN infrastructure from the PCs, as large amounts of traffic from either camp can cause problems for the other. If the PC user begins a large download, it is very likely that the RTP voice traffic will be bumped or delayed, or that the TCP-based client/server application will time out from excessive collisions and retries caused by the RTP traffic. In the best design, you'd want to dedicate ports and queues on your switching infrastructure for the phones and PCs, keeping the traffic separate from end-to-end across your network.

Hanging Up Overall, our experience with the Selsius IP-PBX suite of products left us with very little to complain about. The only significant technical issues that arose during our tests-loss of signal from the overzealous noise-suppression and lack of support for G.729 codecs-should be addressed and resolved within the next few months.

That leaves the cost issues. The phones are not cheap, and neither are the gateways (an eight-port analog gateway costs $4,795). Separate licensing costs for the CallManager software ($25,000 for a 100-user installation) makes the solution more expensive.

The complete cost for a 100-user installation, including licenses, gateways and phones, runs close to $70,000. Although this compares favorably with a PBX system of similar scale, we could expect to get much more functionality from a true PBX.

In the end, though, having the ability to manage our telephony equipment using the same tools and services that we use to manage our PCs makes the extra up-front cost negligible. All in all, we found these units to be more than useful. Anybody interested in deploying first-generation VoIP technology will likely find this to be an excellent choice.

Eric A. Hall is president of EHS Co., a network technology research and testing firm in San Mateo, Calif. Send comments on this article to him at ehall@ehsco.com.

Copyright c 1998 CMP Media Inc.

By Eric Hall

<<NETWORK COMPUTING -- 10-15-98, p. PG98>>

[Copyright 1998, CMP Publications]

More Articles
LAN Fax Takes Center Stage at NetWorld+Interop...
BASIC
IDT's Net2Phone Improves Voice Quality
BASIC
soliton launches h.323 voip access device...
BASIC
telogy networks expands golden gateway voice and...
BASIC
Cisco Ventures In Voice
PREMIUM
HotHaus Offers First Open, DSP-Software Solution...
BASIC
Lucent Technologies Unveils Next-Generation IP...
BASIC
IDT's Internet Net2Phone Improves Voice Quality
PREMIUM
Nortel Networks Builds Unified Network for...
BASIC
OKI/ Oki brings affordable advanced Internet...
PREMIUM

Article Found In
Web Servers
IP Telephony
Quick Search








To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1579)10/23/1998 7:26:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
OT>> SBC-Ameritech Merger Will 'Jumpstart Competition' Chairmen Cite Growth, Consumer Benefits of Merger Before FCC




October 23, 1998



WASHINGTON, Oct. 22 /PRNewswire/ via NewsEdge Corporation -- In comments before the Federal Communications Commission today, the chairmen of SBC Communications (NYSE: SBC) and Ameritech (NYSE: AIT) outlined the global competition driving the merger between the two companies and the benefits that millions of residential and business consumers would enjoy once the combined company begins serving markets across the country.

"I am convinced that the national-local strategy, enabled by this merger, will jumpstart competition just as the Telecommunications Act of 1996 contemplated," said SBC Chairman and CEO Edward E. Whitacre Jr.

"National-local" is the strategy of providing facilities-based competition in the nation's top 50 markets for business and residential customers, which neither company could successfully implement without the merger. The plan anticipates the deployment of 2,900 miles of fiber and 140 switches to serve customers in those markets.

Ameritech Chairman and CEO Richard C. Notebaert focused on customers' demands for telecommunications companies to expand in order to serve all their needs.

"Corporations with worldwide business interests seek the efficiency of a single provider for all their telecom services," Notebaert said. "It is clear that the business of these largest and most sophisticated business customers will move to those companies that come closest to providing the goal of one- stop shopping for end-to-end integrated service. And it is clear that to be competitive in that critical high-end market, communications providers must have significant global reach, a large base of existing business customers and a wealth of technical, financial and managerial resources."

"Our merger has always been driven by growth -- growing sufficiently in scope and scale to meet customer needs and to compete for a place among the global full-service providers," said Notebaert.

"This merger is about transforming our companies from regional carriers to a national competitor," said Whitacre, who said that customers inside and outside the two companies' 13-state region would benefit from the " national- local" strategy. "Obviously, the 59 million business and residential customers in the markets outside our region will have an alternative provider that would not exist but for the merger, " he said.

"We believe that Bell Atlantic-GTE, BellSouth and others who face the brunt of our attack will respond aggressively [in our region]," he said. "MCI/WorldCom, AT&T/TCI and Sprint will increase their own competitive initiatives in and out of our region."

Notebaert noted that the march toward global communications is on, and cautioned that decisions made by the FCC will "determine the extent to which American companies will have opportunities to be players in that marketplace."

"It should be up to customers to decide which companies succeed," he said. "The FCC should not pick winners and losers."

Since the two companies announced plans to merge in May, the merger has received clearances from European regulators, and is now being reviewed by the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission as well as the state commission of Illinois and Ohio. The companies hope to complete the transaction by mid-1999.

SOURCE SBC Communications

/CONTACT: Selim Bingol of SBC Communications, 210-351-3991, or George Stenitzer of Ameritech, 312-609-6166/ (SBC AIT)

[Copyright 1998, PR Newswire]






To: Stephen B. Temple who wrote (1579)10/23/1998 7:31:00 AM
From: Stephen B. Temple  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
OT, but big time news >Time Warner & AT&T Discuss Joint Telecom Venture




October 23, 1998



DULLES, VIRGINIA, U.S.A., Newsbytes via NewsEdge Corporation : In a move that could shift AT&T [NYSE:T] back around 20 years in terms of market dominance, the telecommunications giant has started discussions with Time Warner on the possibility of reciprocal access to each other's telecommunications network.

For AT&T, the prize is the ability to sell its services to Time Warner's cable customers, propelling the company into the "carrier's carrier" situation that its UK partner, British Telecom (BT), is slowly progressing towards.

For Time Warner, meanwhile, the deal solves the problem of the number of local deals for its 12 million cable customers across the US to have access to competitive rates on long distance and international calls. Such a deal, Newsbytes notes, would allow Time Warner to offer a standardized set of rates across the whole of the US.

In the longer term, however, such a linkup would give AT&T access to the potentially massive demand for high bandwidth access to the Internet services that cable users will almost certainly generate in the years ahead.

The deal is an interesting development, Newsbytes notes, as Time Warner is known to be in active discussions with America Online (AOL), regarding allowing AOL to sell wide bandwidth Internet service facilities to Time Warner cable subscribers. With AT&T entering the Time Warner arena, however, there is a real possibility of AOL being shown the company door.

The stakes are high, with AT&T having already committed itself to a merger with Tele-Communications, the cable giant, in a probable $48 billion deal. The deal is currently chugging its way through the government approvals mechanism. Adding AT&T as the third company in the deal makes sound financial sense, Newsbytes notes.

Time Warner, however, says it is continuing to invest in its Road Runner cable modem service, which is estimated to have more than 120,000 subscribers, each of which is paying $40 a month in access fees.

AOL may well be soiling a possible deal with Time Warner as it has separately requested the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to mandate that all Internet service providers (ISPs) can have equal access to cable modem users, in much the same way that all carriers have equal access to the local PSTN (public switched telecommunications network) loop.

According to Jim Cicconi, AT&T's senior vice president for government affairs, AOL's request could cause serious problems for its planned merger with Tele- Communications.

Currently, with around 13 million subscribers, the bulk of whom access the service via modem, AOL is sitting pretty. In the future, however, with DSL (digital subscriber line) and cable modem connections set to take off, an AT &T/Time Warner deal could cause AOL's subscription base to diminish.

That could well throw doubt on AOL President Robert Pittman's commitment earlier this month to investing around $10 billion over the next five years to improve the AOL network infrastructure, Newsbytes notes.

Industry pundits are predicting that a deal between AT&T and Time Warner will almost certainly push AOL's possible deal out into the cold. Ultimately, however, the government's regulatory system could be the deciding factor in all of these matters.

Reported by Newsbytes News Network, newsbytes.com .

(19981022/WIRES TELECOM, BUSINESS/ATTTW/PHOTO)

<<Newsbytes -- 10-22-98>>

[Copyright 1998, NewsBytes]