SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wild Rose who wrote (6145)10/16/1998 9:59:00 PM
From: Tim Hall  Respond to of 11603
 
elry,

<<You are calling LOTS of people
liars and cheats. The law of average is not on your side. >>

I am not calling anyone a liar or a cheat. The BLM actually has a very big window to work with and I will be happy to retract any statement as soon as IPM, Maxam, Naxos, GPGI, etc can show me chain of custody assays, and I want to see the actual report from the consultant doing the chain of custody and I want to see the minerals that contain the pm's. As to who you are, lucky guess, I must have hit close to home. Why don't you quit hiding behind your internet ID and just come foreward and discuss things based on who you are?

Tim



To: Wild Rose who wrote (6145)10/16/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11603
 
<<Tell me why should I believe your tests over all the tests done by
IPM, Maxam, Naxos, Chip, GPGI, etc ?>>

I'll give you a good reason. Without exception, every time a desert dirt has done COC testing, the high metal values previously reported do not stand up.

Name one desert dirt company whose COC wasn't between 0% and 25% of the values reported without COC.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News