Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavalry who wrote (8931)	10/16/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: Mr. Forthright	Respond to of 26163

You changed your mind again? Tell us something new about yourself, will you?

To: Cavalry who wrote (8931)	10/16/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 26163

Well let's get #'s 1-3 out of the way first: You still promulgate this mythical short squeeze just as you did in August. It hasn't happened, and it won't. Jane doesn't continue to blatantly hype something she knows to not be the truth. You do. That's the difference. I might add that you continue attempting to seperate people from their money on your other definite short squeeze issues, too. I would suggest that you'd be better off mugging little old ladies in the street. After all, you'd get the money faster, and your ethical boundaries, as previously demonstrated on this thread and others, wouldn't seem to interfere. …and for #4: Cut 'n' paste all you want. Feel free to PM me for directions on how to do it. I'm not the two-faced liar here—you are. If you take up my mugging advice, try around the first of the month—that's when most of the Social Security checks come out. ________ oh, I see you edited to include a #5. Well, when you can make that into a complete sentence that one can understand, I'll respond to it. As it is now, I really can't grammatically fathom your point. Clarify?

To: Cavalry who wrote (8931)	10/16/1998 11:55:00 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

you said>>>4 should i cut and paste the posts and expose you for what you really are.<<< You don't seem to remember all the lies you have been caught in do you celery head? These first two are about the lie you told about sending ton to the lab to prove it wasn't stevia. >>>>To: +Icabod (36 ) From: +Cavalry Tuesday, Sep 8 1998 1:50AM ET Reply #4214 of 41 icabod my scarey friend, tell me how to prove to si that touch of nature is not stevia, help me icabod, dont post wackiness, steer me in the path to the truth how can we scientifically prove it's not repackaged stevia but the next giant winner. Cavalry ps icabod says is not scientific proof To: s martin (4218 ) From: Cavalry Tuesday, Sep 8 1998 2:39AM ET Reply #4221 of 8949 you see s martin i have a problem the lab i sent the sample to is under investigation by the fda or the sec they dont want me posting it or involving them in aznt, they have their hands full Cav <<<<<<< These next two lies were back to back, an acheivement even for you. >>>To: Icabod (596 ) From: Cavalry Saturday, Aug 22 1998 10:13AM ET Reply #621 of 8951 did you mention the 1999 websters dictionary will add that word and in the definition there will be a mention of aznt, another well thought out informative post thanks for that answer cav To: Icabod (606 ) From: Cavalry Saturday, Aug 22 1998 10:16AM ET Reply #622 of 8952 cavalry is driving to vegas next week to do just that and meet aznt mgmt and i will report all back to this thread upon my return cav <<<<<< or how about claiming that people that never heard of AZNT were on the board of directors. To: Janice Shell (503 ) From: Cavalry Friday, Aug 21 1998 8:49PM ET Reply #506 of 8953 that is a fair criteria and i agree with it and thank you for your response can you find anything on George Petit National Cancer Research institiute or Andrew Weild believe they are on aznt board of directors, impressive names imo cav Do you want a few more examples of your lies? These aren't all. zonkie........