SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34080)10/17/1998 1:29:00 AM
From: Merritt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB:

In your post to J.C. you referred to stagflation, and in an earlier post you referred to the Republicans causing the problems of the 70's. The stagflation of the 70's, IMO, was caused by Johnson's "war on poverty" program being conducted at the same time as the war in Viet Nam. Those two things resulted in Nixon taking the dollar off the international gold standard, which in turn, caused OPEC to raise prices by curtailing production. At least that's my interpretation. In today's world, we have the Japanese, and maybe others, selling dollars and causing it to weaken. With already low oil prices, what do you think the chances are of OPEC getting together and doing what they did in the 70's?

Best, Merritt



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34080)10/17/1998 6:49:00 AM
From: valueminded  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike:

What is it that makes you see oil at $18/barrel ? If demand doesn't do it, is it the supply thate will be curtailed ?

I thought stagflation was measured at the consumer level, if mfg have no pricing flex and their cost to produce goes up but cost to customer is constrained, it would seem that we would just get a recession without the accompanying inflation

thanks



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34080)10/17/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: geewiz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Gooood Morning everyone,

Mike, if we do get a return of the crazy valuations its' difficult to see how it can be sustained with the same rhetoric: AOL, AMZN, DELL etc... are there enough Paul's? (vbg); good value today in the oils and bios; BRR and PPP at 50% over book.... But it is hard to imagine where the potential market capitalization could be transfered to; sure we will experience futher significant loss, but valuations of tech sector are still large.

Waiting on your comments on the MU fiasco..

thanks art