Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WISDOM MILES who wrote (9394)	10/17/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Colin Cody	Respond to of 19331

Wisdom, you shouted at me: YOU BETTER FIND OUT WHAT DOES "QUIET PERIOD" MEANS. "QUIET PERIOD" DOESN'T MEANS "KEEP QUIET" OR "SHUT UP" ON ANYTHING. IT MEANS KEEPING QUIET ON ONE BIG ISSUE (WHICH NO ONE KNOWS NOW) . Now I do see from your posts that you've been around this stock for at least a while although I don't know you since you are hiding behind a name/handle with a new S.I. ID for whatever reasons you have chosen. . Given that, I see in your first post that you mentioned "3 years of [DCI] posts" which of course as a joke since virtually no one ever heard of this stock until May 1996. Until late May or maybe it was June of 1996 DCIC barely traded "by appointment". . Now for your edification, here is the Company's publicly announced definition of said “Quiet Period” (OTC Bulletin Board: DCTC), an international provider of telecommunications and Internet services, announced today that it will be entering a"quiet period." This means it will be unable to provide nonpublic comment or guidance on the Company's activities in the near-term. . In a news release announced a number of weeks later: While this release is significant it does not constitute an end to the quiet period announced by DCI on September 4, 1998. . Its seems that the written policy of the Company differs markedly with your suggested definition of their quiet period. . Which brings me back to my original statement that as a shareholder I take exception to the two separate cadres of shareholders who [allegedly] have had quasi-public discussions with management who [allegedly] provided [public?] comment or guidance on the Company's activities. . Colin