SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (9923)10/17/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
Montana Republican tells candidates' forum: "Clinton should be shot"

By Jerry White
World Socialist Workers Web Site
17 October, 1998

Bob Davies, a Republican candidate for the Montana State Legislature,
spoke at a Republican fundraiser and candidates' forum near Bozeman on
October 9 and declared that President Clinton "should be shot."

Davies, a candidate for House District 27, said this is how he responds
when he goes door to door and is asked by voters whether Clinton should
be impeached. He also said Clinton was guilty of treason and should be
executed for selling satellite technology to the Chinese government, and
that his actions were no different than those of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
The Rosenbergs were electrocuted in 1953, at the height of the
McCarthyite witch-hunt, after being convicted of passing atomic secrets to
the Soviet Union.

Montana Governor Marc Racicot was among the Republican officials at
the forum. Neither he nor any other official interrupted Davies, opposed his
threats against the president, or reported Davies' comments to law
enforcement authorities. Advocating attacks against the president is a
federal crime, punishable by five years in prison or a $250,000 fine.

Davies' comments only came to light two days later when a letter from one
of those who attended the meeting appeared in the Bozeman Daily
Chronicle. Kirk Astroth, a youth development specialist at Montana State
University, recounted Davies' remarks, saying, "I am filled with disgust
when I hear someone like Bob Davies who is running for public office
advocate violence against other public officials."

The letter sparked several complaints about Davies to the regional Secret
Service Office in Great Falls, which said it was investigating the matter and
would be turning the case over to the US Attorney's office.

Governor Racicot did not respond to reporters' inquiries about Davies'
remarks for nearly a week. He then issued a perfunctory statement
disassociating himself from the threats against Clinton. The Republican
National Committee has remained silent. When the World Socialist Web
Site contacted the director of the Montana Republican Committee, Sue
Akey, she attempted to distance herself from Davies' comments, but said
the party would not retract its endorsement of his campaign.

In an interview with the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, Davies attempted to
downplay his statements. "I'm certainly not advocating any paramilitary
development," he said. "It was a Republican meeting. It was a light-hearted
thing, kind of a joke. And no one took it seriously except for him
[Astroth], who was obviously a Democratic plant. I didn't make any
suggestion that I or any other private citizen should do the executing."

He continued, "The implication is that I'm trying to incite violence against
the president, which I'm not. It would be a total disaster from my point of
view if someone did a Lee Harvey Oswald on Clinton. He would be
viewed as a martyr and his legislative agenda, which I vigorously oppose,
would be enacted."

According to a reporter from the Chronicle, Davies is an electrical
engineer, originally from Pittsburgh, who moved to Montana to work on
US military missile silos for Boeing and Sylvania in the 1960s. He became
a member of the ultra-right John Birch Society in the 1970s.

Prior to his current election bid, Davies was defeated as the Republican
candidate for US Congress in 1982 and the state House of
Representatives in 1990. He is seeking the seat of Republican Jack Wells,
who is running for state senator this year. Like Wells, Davies is a rabid
opponent of government taxes for public education and other services. He
advocates replacing income and real estate taxes with a single consumer
tax, and giving parents vouchers to pay for home schooling and private
education.

The district includes parts of Bozeman, a town of 20,000 and the home of
Montana State University, as well the mansions and "ranchettes" of the
very wealthy, including NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, CNN owner
Ted Turner and film star Mel Gibson.

Montana has been hard hit by an agricultural crisis that has wiped out many
small farmers, and most new jobs have come in the low-pay service
sector. These conditions have created fertile ground for the emergence of
the extreme right-wing Montana Militia and Montana Freemen movements.
Davies denies any connections to the militia movement, but he shares their
fascistic sentiments and their identification of Clinton with "big government"
and even socialism.

Davies' remarks and the silence of top Republicans underscore the degree
to which right-wing radicals have come to exercise a dominant influence
over the Republican Party.



To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (9923)10/17/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
Financial scandal threatens to engulf French presidency

By Gerard Naville
World Socialist Web Site
16 September 1998

The latest of a series of investigations into the finances of political parties in
France has led to the indictment of ex-prime minister Alain Juppé and
widespread suspicions of illegal financial practices by President Jacques
Chirac.

Juppé, who was prime minister until June 1997, and Chirac are the two
most prominent political figures to be targeted by the investigating judge of
Nanterre, Patrick Desmure. He has been leading the inquiry into the
finances of the Gaullist party, Rassemblement pour la Republique (RPR),
for the last three years. Also charged is Michel Roussin, an ex-minister in
Juppé's cabinet and prior to that a principal private secretary to Chirac in
his former position as mayor of Paris. The charges have been brought
under the law on financial transparency concerning political parties,
introduced in 1988 and amended in 1990 and 1995.

Juppé has been charged with covering up the payment of staff working for
the RPR by the Paris Council (the capital city's administration) and by
private companies during his tenure as general secretary of the party.
Charges levelled against him include "embezzlement of public funds",
"complicity to and concealment of aggravated breach of trust", and
"concealing the misappropriation of public property".

Chirac's name came up for the first time in relationship to investigations into
illegal party funding in March this year. Robert Galley, treasurer of the
RPR between 1984 and 1990, also under investigation, told the judge that
Chirac had asked him to find money more or less by any means necessary.
Juppé was linked to illegal funding activities when an ex-head of personnel
at the Paris Council, Georges Quémar, told the daily Le Parisien in May
that there were around 200 "fictitious contracts" at the Paris Council during
the 1980s.

A search at the Hotel de Ville, the headquarters of the Paris Council, in the
first week of July produced 15 of these illegal contracts. This became the
basis on which Juppé and Michel Roussin were officially charged and
summonsed to appear before the court on August 21. Four days later,
Juppé intervened on the main television channel, TF1. He accepted
responsibility for everything that happened in the period concerned,
explaining that, all in all, he had worked to "adapt" the RPR's practices to
the new laws once they came into effect.

By "taking responsibility for this entire period", Juppé was clearly trying to
protect Chirac against any further accusations. Nevertheless the following
day the leading daily Le Monde announced that "the investigation was
moving closer to Chirac's presidential election campaign" of 1995. Their
article said that some of the people hired via the suspicious contracts were
active as staff for Chirac's election campaign. They cited one document
carrying Chirac's handwriting as example of his involvement into the murky
system of nepotism practised by the Paris council.

As a consequence of Juppé's indictment, a discussion has started about the
possibility of treating the head of state, Chirac, like any other person if he
has committed actions against the law before he became president. This
line is pushed by the current Minister of Justice, Elisabeth Guigou of the
Socialist Party (PS), but has met strong opposition as an attack on the
functioning of the presidency.

The investigation into the RPR finances started three years ago, just two
months after Chirac became president and Juppé his prime minister. It
originally focussed on unknown figures, most of them treasurers and
ex-treasurers of the RPR. It only started to involve major figures earlier this
year as Jean Tiberi, Chirac's right hand and his successor as mayor of
Paris, and his wife were investigated.

Another investigation has been launched into the finances of the Union pour
la Démocratie Française (UDF), the former coalition partner of the RPR.
In August leaders of the UDF, including its president, François Léotard, an
ex-minister of defence in the Balladur government, were summonsed
before the judge to explain the origins of loans made to one of the parties
in the UDF coalition, Democratie Libérale (DL). The investigation has
prompted accusations and counter-accusations within the UDF and DL,
making the already existing internal warfare even more poisonous. Léotard
refused to sign the protocol of his meeting with the investigating judges.

These investigations are accompanied by a media campaign that is
remarkable in that it takes at face value everything the judges say. Every bit
of evidence and every move by the judiciary is followed by teams of
reporters and widely publicised. Political figures, whose every word was
published as indisputable truths when they were in government, are now
presented in page-long articles as corrupt and shady characters.

Such investigations in the past served the purpose of keeping under control
corrupt financial practices that, if unchecked, would undermine the
credibility of the parties that have constituted the bedrock of the Fifth
Republic. The effect of this investigation, however, is to destabilise the
parties themselves, particularly the Gaullist RPR, whose two top leaders,
Juppé and Chirac, are now under attack.

In the last days of August a number of leaders of the RPR went on the
offensive to oppose what they described as a concerted attempt to
destabilise their party. Philippe Seguin, the party's president, opposed
judicial attacks against the national president as contrary to the constitution.
He told Le Monde on August 28 that the "type of investigation presently
conducted by the judge Patrick Desmure, the consequence of which is to
discredit the politicians and through them, democracy, can well go on for
another 10 or 15 years, if nothing is done." He asked the government to
redefine the laws on party finances, which should only condemn practices
leading to personal enriching. This was opposed by Prime Minister and
Socialist Party leader Lionel Jospin with the argument that such a decision
would look like an amnesty.

Significantly the financial scandal has unfolded over three months that have
been dominated by the bitter conflict between different wings of the main
bourgeois parties over the question of collaborating with the fascist Front
National (FN). Sections of the UDF have actually merged with the FN and
now run regional administrations alongside them. The majority of the RPR
leaders have up to now opposed such an approach. The leading politicians
involved in the two investigations are those who have been most outspoken
against any collusion with the FN because of the fear of destabilising
political life in France and provoking opposition in the working class.

The move to indict Juppé and then Léotard came within weeks of the
French victory in the Soccer World Cup. The success of a French team,
composed for a great part of players whose parents were immigrants, was
used as a rallying point by those politicians opposed to involving the FN in
government. Chirac placed himself at the head of enthusiastic crowds
celebrating a mixture of nationalism and multiculturalism.