Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (7954)	10/17/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

thread emergency, contagious whine-o-virus, quarantined immediately Scott, yes doc, but I have to differ somewhat on the infectious agent's nature, method of spread, containment and wait for heal period. wl has been hired by shorters to bring down the share price of GPGI. He is authorized to use any means possible, and since the shorters have no facts or proof to say if precious metals exist or not in the dirt, then wl must simply say "don't exist, prove it to me". So we must remind wl that its not this threads responsibility to prove the dirt, but only to engage in speculation to decide buy hold and sell activity. Each threader must make their own determination based on the free flow of information. All must be reminded that the information put onto this thread is by nature unproven and hear say, with a strong possibility of falsehood if a poster has a secret agenda. So when wl says no gold is in the dirt, then rather than anyone on this thread throw out the information that has convinced themselves that gold is in the dirt, one should simply acknoledge that wl's statement is his speculation and not a proven fact, and no one has to unprove his statement, since to unprove that not yet proven is folly. wl has his agenda, and he will stick to it completely. Its his current job assignment. wl is not in a position for conversation, so threaders should stop trying for a 2 way dialog. wl's inner self wants to hurt that on the outside if he can see a connection to another being. wl likes it best if he can hurt another, but the other has to acknoledge the pain by a comment or loosing temper or saying ouch. Without the verification, wl receives an empty reward he tried to obtain for himself. So simply reply to wl with cold few dry unemotional word types of sentences. Doug