SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Derivatives: Darth Vader's Revenge -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (570)10/18/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2794
 
LK "So some poor sop who takes home $100k would owe $93k on his house, car, and Visa. "

Something screwy about this statement? If a person takes home $100, 000 after tax and deductions, he then has his normal living expenses. His disposable income is what is left after that and, if the statistic is correct, he then has only 7% of what is then left for discretionary items, including savings (from what I've read very little goes there)

In a single leap we've gone from a sapling to the whole forest I see?

If I read you correctly, you have complete faith in monetary policy as the engine which creates demand. What has worked in the past will always work in the future? But isn't demand created also by peoples' perception of the future - that the good times will continue to roll? If this perception changes, if lay- offs escalate, won't expenditure be deferred, and repayment of debt become a priority? E



To: Frodo Baxter who wrote (570)10/19/1998 9:00:00 AM
From: Worswick  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2794
 
Many thanks for the interesting urls Lawrence.

I think the future is very bright. I do agree. Certainly. I think that for the present, however, we are going to have difficult time getting to the future.

My best to you this gorgeous am,

Clark