To: d:oug who wrote (7962 ) 10/19/1998 8:22:00 PM From: d:oug Respond to of 14226
To me, I betting that no news from Mike McKay(Oct 1) is good news. <<< I intend to commit my time to work on this program, which will reduce my time to discuss it. My best to all. Mike McKay >>> I still predict that the next news will contain a continuation of the past mistakes(momentum) with the addition of a newly created plan to prevent past errors and misguided procedures. A transition period will be needed before fruits can be obtained for picking. Hopefully the blossoms will already be pollinated by Mike's touch. But then maby Mike's no reply since Oct 1 is a result of him giving up in frustration. This I doubt, since I'am sure he would have acknowledged Richard call for possible shareholders action to correct, most likely thru change, GPGI management content. My speculation, of a possible. As to the sag telling me to put up or shut up, I will first wish no rain related damage was done to the sa members in that location, then I now say that I want to invest into GPGI as a means to spread out my desert dirt investments. So with the low stock price, I see a way for the company to turn things around now with Mike. To me this possible thing should be showned in the next days or couple weeks. If not, then the other direction of shareholders action would most likely put this company on-hold for a long time, and I go to another desert dirt company looking for a more stable place. Not being a shareholder, I have nothing here to salavage or protect. So its in my interest if this thread would stop dumping on current GPGI management and wait a week or 2 for the Mike factor to present itself. A Mike change might result in the desired effect wanted to insure the protection and increase of share value. Dumping on GPGI now may make any Mike's plan harder for him to accomplish. Doug