SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: shane forbes who wrote (15748)10/18/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: akmike  Respond to of 25814
 
Shane-I goofed! 4.2m not 4%. I didn't mean to imply a sequential compounding of yen depreciation but that the yen depreciated more in 3Q than in 2Q. The decline in consumer revenues is perplexing; here is my guess: 2Q=95m(maybe communications was disproportionately part of the 3 similar divisions then). In 3Q yen depreciated say 7m (s/b twice as much as 2Q but base probably fell). Dcam was due to get vol.shipments in Sept. and Oct.,this probably slipped a little from July. Sony's price decrease from LSI for PSI could have been backended in 2Q having fuller impact on 3Q. Impact of these plus growth in DVD about neutral. STB customer losses (2) say 9m=95-7-16=79 or close enough to a ballpark 20%.
The above seems to give stb too large a # from 2Q unless a good portion of stb sales were to Japanese firms and denominated in yen.
Maybe we should just admit that we have insufficient data from the base q to make reasonable assumptions...

Best

Mike



To: shane forbes who wrote (15748)10/18/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: akmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25814
 
Shane-maybe we're making it too hard. What if Wilf used the run rate as the base for the 20%? Then 20% of 440=88m;and dcam amd dvd made up for most of the drop in stb. In the grand scheme of things it probably doesn't make any difference anyway. LSI is going to be a "show-me" company for at least 2 qtrs. and maybe several more.

Best,

Mike



To: shane forbes who wrote (15748)10/22/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25814
 
Shane,

Not trying to pump up the thread again, but this should be good for LSI...no???

Message 6124649

1999 isn't that far off.:-)

DavidG