SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (31923)10/18/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 94695
 
GZ, just as I've been saying since early August, bull market indicators in bear markets won't work - if we are in a bear market. I think the evidence has now become very obvious with Greeny lowering rates and Merril Lynch laying off people - the party is over and this fat beara is singing. Bear market rallies, no new highs - read my lips -g-

I think this is why you have the tremendous volitility. People are holding on the this bull with 16 years of ingrained dipsterism. the 20's bull and the 87 bull were much shorter time spans. I think confusion will reign -g-

Okay, so how do you explain the advance decline divergence we just saw? That same pattern at all, or most, bottoms? Huh?

Bull backside of the peak trap.

The chart is mimicking last year's corrective period. We had a bear coil into December 8th, then a drop into December 19th. On the NDX it was a retest of the October lows. Then a rally into Jan 1. Then the quick drop into Jan 12.

I had been convinced that because of the 9 month cycle, that the drop into 10/8 was both declines combined together 12/19 and 1/12. However now I am beggining to think we are at January 1st now and expect another drop into late October.

Note: Last December NDX made a higher low. This time it made a lower low,.

bb



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (31923)10/18/1998 4:56:00 PM
From: set  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
> how do you explain the advance decline divergence we just saw?

noticed that. Usually it's supposed to be a sign that the leaders
are leading and the pack will follow. However, following Don
Sews lead I went looking at 1973 where lo, the same thing
happened at the end of the year leading into the abysmal
1974 market.

decisionpoint.com

It may be a question of extent. The same thing happened
in late 74 in a much larger and more conspicuous way, and
that did lead to a meaningful rally

decisionpoint.com

the current one
decisionpoint.com

BTW that period
decisionpoint.com
must have been pure hell on everybody.