SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton -- doomed & wagging, Japan collapses, Y2K bug, etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (654)10/18/1998 8:21:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Remember my earlier predictions concerning Netanyahu!

The Telegraph - London - 10/18/98

By Philip Jacobson in Jerusalem

Foundation for Middle East Peace

Jerusalem Post

The Anatomy of the Arab-Israeli Conflict - Out There News

ISRAELI security chiefs have warned the country's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, that he could become the target for
Right-wing Jewish extremists after making further territorial concessions to the Palestinians.

His security officials have made him wear a bullet-proof vest when visiting settlements on the West Bank. As Mr Netanyahu
continued talks with Yasser Arafat at the Middle East summit in Maryland yesterday, police and intelligence sources were
co-ordinating plans for dealing with a violent reaction by hardline settlers in the West Bank.

Security around the Prime Minister has been increased in the face of an increasingly venomous campaign against him and other
senior government figures. Posters depicting Mr Netanayahu in an Arab keffiyah and daubed with the slogan "The Liar" have
appeared in Jerusalem.

On a recent visit to the West Bank flashpoint of Hebron after the killing of a local settler by Palestinian militants, Mr Netanyahu wore
a bullet-proof vest at the insistence of his bodyguards. His predecessor Yitzhak Rabin, assassinated in 1995, always refused to do
so.

The Shin Beth domestic security agency that protects top politicians has also increased personal security for Israel's President,
Ezer Weizman, whom settler organisations have denounced as a "traitor".

Officials monitoring Jewish extremists say that they are reaching desperation point: for the first time, they are threatening Israeli
soldiers with death. According to the newspaper Ha'aretz, a group of army officers under orders to escort Arabs to their olive
plantations, backed down after being warned by hard-liners from a nearby settlement that "there are snipers in the trees and you'll
get a bullet between the eyes".

An Israeli MP who has campaigned for the demolition of the shrine erected around the grave of Baruch Goldstein, who massacred
29 Muslim worshippers at Hebron in 1994, has received repeated death threats. Earlier this month, Ran Cohen's car was set alight
outside his home: he told journalists that he believed a new "Jewish underground movement" was responsible.

In swift response, Mr Netanyahu announced that he had ordered police to give top priority to arresting those behind an act that
"endangers the existence of a society capable of conducting a legitimate discourse".

The former head of Israel's national police also emphasised the seriousness of the threat posed by the most militant and embittered
settler organisations: "We know their potential."

As tension in the West Bank continued to escalate, several Jewish activists in the Hebron region have been detained on suspicion
of planning attacks on Palestinians. There is particular concern about the risk of Jewish terrorists attempting to destroy sites holy to
Islam, such as the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, to provoke all-out confrontation between Israel and the
Arab nations.

Two months ago, Mr Netanyahu reviewed security arrangements at key sites with Shin Beth officials and there are reports that extra
precautions are already in place.



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (654)10/18/1998 8:23:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
The Telegraph - London - 10/18/98

By Julian West in New Delhi

Indian and Pakistani Nuclear Tests - Centre for Non-Proliferation Studies

The Times of India

Pakistan Today

INDIA is to conduct its first simulated nuclear-war drill as part of major military manoeuvres near the Pakistan border next month.

The move follows atomic test blasts conducted by both the south Asian rival states earlier this year and has alarmed Western
observers and neighbouring countries.

According to Western intelligence reports, Indian troops will be drilled on how to deal with the fall-out from a nuclear strike. Soldiers
will receive training in matters such as dealing with the effects of electromagnetic radiation on radio and computer equipment, and
tackling water contamination and destruction of roads and communications links. Meanwhile, the Indian air force and navy, which
will conduct exercises in the Arabian Sea, will move on to a correspondingly higher state of alert.

The war games are India's first since both it and Pakistan carried out simultaneous manoeuvres in 1987. These earlier exercises
brought the two countries to the brink of war. In recent years, both sides have embarked on ambitious missile-testing programmes,
and recent tensions over the disputed state of Kashmir have renewed fears of war.

George Fernandes, India's defence minister, who described the forthcoming war games as "routine", has accused the West of
inflaming tensions by spreading alarm about a possible conflict. However, China, which shares a border with India and Pakistan,
expressed "concern" last week over India's manoeuvres and urged both countries to show restraint. New Delhi has already angered
Beijing by citing a possible threat from China as one of the reasons for conducting its nuclear test blasts - an allegation which the
Chinese have called "outrageous".

Pakistan, which said it had received notification from India of only a "routine exercise", expressed alarm over the scale and timing of
the manoeuvres - news of which came shortly before senior diplomats from both countries met in Islamabad last week.

The Pakistanis plan to go ahead with routine winter field-firing exercises, involving artillery and infantry forces, in various parts of the
country, including the southern Sindh desert, bordering India. But a much larger, joint army and air-force exercise, which had been
planned to be held simultaneously, has been cancelled because of lack of funds. The country, which has been badly hit by
international sanctions following the nuclear tests, is reported to have defaulted on its foreign debt, although this has not been
announced officially.

India's defence ministry, which has played down next month's war games, has not disclosed whether the army will be testing its
missiles, although exercises on this scale are usually carried out with missile launchers. Both India and Pakistan currently possess
short-range missiles capable of striking each other's targets.

Western intelligence reports have disclosed that several divisions of the Desert Strike corps, numbering well over 100,000 troops,
will be involved in the war games and will take part in nuclear drills. Military analysts are watching to see if India will use the
opportunity to test a command-and-control system, involving politicians. The army has recently completed a proposal for such a
system, but India, unlike most other countries, is unusual in that its military has been excluded from all strategic military
decision-making.

The normal links between the government and the military to determine who orders a nuclear strike, and how this is executed, have
not yet been established in India - a failing that worries Western military analysts.

One analyst said: "India is rapidly developing its nuclear-weapons programme, but it has absolutely no link between the army, the
politicians and the bureaucrats. In today's scenario, this presents a very worrying and dangerous situation."



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (654)10/18/1998 9:11:00 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1151
 
It's War. Are We Ready? By Andy and Berit Kjos

"I don,t think the United States understand what it,s in for. This will be a long, perhaps never ending, attritional war. Pandora,s box
has been opened, and it won't be closed again," warned David B. Anderson, an authority on militant Islamic groups. He was quoted
in a New York Times article by Philip She non aptly titled, "America Embarks on Struggle with Domestic Costs" (8-23-98).

Shenon also quoted Madeleine Albright, who said, "It,s like being in a war. I think we are embarked on a venture in which we have to
deal over the long run with what is the very serious threat to our way of life."

Indeed, it is. But is America ready to set aside treasured civil rights in order to fight this "long, perhaps never-ending" war? Are
Christians prepared to follow God no matter what happens? Could this war provide our president with an excuse to implement the
draconian measures outlined in his Executive Orders?

Two months before his missile strikes against terrorist targets on two continents, President Clinton toured China where he praised
his host, President Jiang Zemin, for his "good imagination," "vision," and "extraordinary intellect". "We're trying to build the same
kind of world in the future," he said, "and not a very different kind of world. And I hope we'll get there."

China,s leader, who is rich and capitalistic enough to fit the fascist as well as communist camp, has all kinds of enviable powers to
track dissenters, control political opposition, and subdue legal foes. Clinton doesn,t ­ yet. But with the right kind of crisis ­ such as
Y2K or the rising threat of terrorism ­ could our president declare martial law and assume dictatorial powers?

Hitler did it. As chancellor, he craved total control. His opportune moment came with the burning of the Reichstag, a crisis
apparently instigated by Nazi leaders then blamed on a Communist dissenter.

President Clinton, in his speech explaining the military strikes against targets in Sudan and Afghanistan, called for "strength,
courage, and endurance." Surely the latter will be needed, for spending nearly $80 million to destroy the terrorist targets could prove
tantamount to throwing a rock into a hornet,s nest. After all, Americans provide easy targets compared to the countless, angry,
mobile, and far flung members of Bin Laden,s loose-linked network. And if Bin Laden is killed, "other, more shadowy extremists"
stand ready to take his place. (NYT 8-23-98)

"We will take our revenge against the enemies of Islam, and we will teach the children of America not to tangle with the Muslims,"
said Mohammed Khalid, one of the injured Pakistanis. "This cowardly attack will not go unpunished!" (SF Examiner, 8-23-98)

We have reasons for concern. Not just because of terrorist counter-attacks or political repercussions for what some nations see as
violations of international law and national sovereignty, but because Clinton,s kind of "war on terror" could swiftly erode what is left of
privacy and freedom in this nation. With the "right" spin, the publicity surrounding the attacks adds "the psychological dimension of
power" needed to rally the consent of the masses to unthinkable government "solutions" to the crisis.

Remember the anti-terrorist bill that eventually passed after the Oklahoma bombing? It,s power to track "suspected terrorists" (See
"Me, a Terrorist?" at crossroad.to ) pales when compared to any of the following Executive Orders which were declared
law with no reaction from Congress.

Any major crisis could authorize our president to run our nation virtually unopposed from the White House. For example,
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 alone gives authorization to activate all the other Executive Orders in times of increased international
tensions and economic or financial crisis. Ponder the power other EO,s would grant to our President during an ongoing crisis:
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public
funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to
institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional
institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21
operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the
mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial
institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President,
Congress cannot review the action for six months. 1

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13010 grants the government authority to "protect" (resolve physical or cyber threats to) these critical
infrastructures: telecommunications, electrical power systems, gas and oil storage and transportation, banking and finance,
transportation, water supply systems, emergency services (including medical, police, fire, and rescue), and continuity of
government.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13011 created a massive new bureaucracy linking all U.S. federal departments and agencies with international
and non-governmental organizations, and authorized it to manage "Federal Information Technology." (See our article at: )

Finally, if EXECUTIVE ORDER 13083 is allowed to stand, it would effectively abolish the 10th Amendment and revoke state and
local authority whenever they hinder federal regulatory goals.

Let me repeat, all our president needs is the right crisis at the right time. He may have found it in an ongoing "war on terror". If so, it
could end our freedom. As Clinton said on March 22, 1994, "And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When
personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it."

The specific crisis is less important than readiness to use it for despotic purposes. In his article titled "Fascism marches again?"
James Davidson, principal of Strategic Advisors Overseas Ltd. asked, "Would Clinton declare martial law over Y2K disruptions?
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I hope we never find out. But when arbitrary power is within reach of a sociopath, anything can happen."
(Strategic Investment, 7-22-98)

Is our president a sociopath? Perhaps his use of FBI,s secret files to blackmail to intimidate critics and silence his opposition could
weigh more heavily against him than his lies and sex habits.

In an interesting dialogue reported by Mr. Davidson, former White House Press Secretary Stephanopoulos suggested that the
president would use blackmail to hinder investigations into his activities. "Are you suggesting that what they are beginning to say is
that: 'If you investigate this too much, we will put all your dirty linen right on the table?'" asked reporter Sam Donaldson. "Every
member of the Senate? Every member of the press corps?"

"Absolutely," answered Mr. Stephanopoulos. "The President said he would never resign and I think some around him are willing to
take everybody down with him." Former Clinton strategist, Dick Morris, seems to agree. According to Davidson, he claims "the
secret police" were used to dig up "embarrassing information to intimidate those witnesses into silence or to discredit them if they
went public."

Davidson ends his report with the alarming conclusion that with all the strings already in his hands, President Clinton himself may
be bound by even tighter constraints:

"Remember that Russia, like China has an effective intelligence effort directed at the United States. The successors to the KGB no
doubt have been far more effective than Ken Starr in compiling evidence of Clinton's crimes. That being likely, you can expect
Clinton to be almost as fawning over Yeltsin as he was over Jiang Zemin. I can hear him now, Russia has the right leadership at the
right time., Yeltsin has a good imagination ... vision ... extraordinary intellect.'"

Yeltsin may fade away, and Russia sink back into chaos and tyranny, but the capability of totalitarian nations like Russia and China
to pull American strings would only grow more threatening.

Long ago, the Old Testament warned us it could happen. If God,s people would obey His voice and follow His ways, He promised to
bless the people, water their fields, and make their nation the leader and lender among the nations: "And the LORD will make you
the head and not the tail."

But if they refused to listen, Israel would face drought, disease and oppression. Their beloved land would become the least among
nations ­ a mere tail wagged by stronger tyrants: "He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you
shall be the tail." (Deuteronomy 28:13, 44)

Considering the warning in 1 Corinthians 10:11, we may be traveling the same downhill path. But God promises to guide, guard, and
strengthen those who turn to Him. It won,t be an easy path. We will need to pray that He train us in true endurance ­ a readiness to
stand firm and full of hope in the truths of our King until His return, no matter what happens. Don,t forget, after telling His friends
about the hard times ahead, Jesus promised:

"These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I
have overcome the world." (in John 16:33)

<><

Andy and Berit Kjos



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (654)10/19/1998 7:32:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
In 1974, a young female attorney helped draw up the rules under which
Richard M. Nixon would be tried by the Congress for impeachment.
"Impeachment," she wrote, "does not have to be for criminal offenses, but only for a 'course of conduct' that, while not particularly criminal, might be of such a nature that it destroys trust, discourages allegiance, and demands action by the Congress." She wrote that "The Office of the President is such that it calls for a higher level of conduct than expected from the average citizen in the United States." This young female attorney who helped write the standard under which Presidents are to be judged by the House of Representatives has a unique perspective about the present situation in the White House. You see, that female attorney who said that an unethical "course of conduct" could overthrow a President is now the First Lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton