SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald Walls who wrote (67013)10/19/1998 2:54:00 AM
From: Night Trader  Respond to of 186894
 
Gerald,
AMD is already cash flow positive. Kurlack (no current fan of AMD or MPs generally) has estimates of $413 million cash flow in '98 and $688 million in '99. In fact AMD is selling for only about 4 times next years cash flow. However, as with many technology companies this is not FREE CASH FLOW as most (perhaps all) of it will have to be reinvested or to help pay off AMD's huge debts.



To: Gerald Walls who wrote (67013)10/19/1998 3:07:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
<Have they? This is a just a question, not an attack, but is AMD cash flow positive or are they using carry-forwards and other credits to show a profit? Are they planning to boost advertising expenses to promote their latest Intel killer? Are they planning to boost manufacturing spending to bring it up to full production?>

I've heard from the AMD thread that AMD is deferring some of the Q3 sales into Q4, presumably from a fear that Q3 was a little "too good" and that Q4 could be a downer.

As for advertising, I don't know what AMD plans to do about that. AMD themselves is going by the assertion that all those "Intel Inside" ads don't mean squat. But AMD will still have trouble trying to build up brand-name recognition with 3D-Now! without more ads. Also, AMD may not be able to spare the money for advertising if it hopes to ramp up its Dresden fab.

Speaking of the Dresden Fab 30, that could be AMD's biggest headache in 1999. We all know AMD's track record when it comes to ramping up new processes. That "Mustang" called the K7 isn't going to mean anything if AMD can't crank them out in huge volumes. And AMD can't afford to decrease K6 production when initially ramping up the K7, lest they want to screw over their OEM customers for a quarter or two.

Like I said, AMD's business strategy is very high risk. I don't think AMD will go bankrupt, but I don't believe AMD's profits are going to soar, either.

Tenchusatsu