SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DaveMG who wrote (16741)10/19/1998 10:47:00 AM
From: Mika Kukkanen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
First, think that the argument should be, "is there is a need for 3G services?" If not, as it seems most operators would say today, then all systems have an upgrade to the so called 2.5G. The TDMA (both) camps have a slight advantage on the time-line/implementation, and certainly on the number of operators (market). Therefore, the suppliers for these systems should be well set-up for the next few years. If this is the case, then question is; "what system do I need today?"

cdmaOne might be the fastest growing, well 1+1 does equal 2...a 100% growth! So what? All future predictions tend to be miles out. It is a case of what "new" 2G operators are going to select and that, without the rhetoric, is still a very open question.



To: DaveMG who wrote (16741)10/21/1998 6:42:00 AM
From: Dave  Respond to of 152472
 
DaveMG:

And why should Q care which system wins out, since it has critical IPR for both.

One point, DaveMG, it is still a little too early to tell. However, it appears that there is a possiblity that the ETSI, along with its membership, may need a license from Qualcomm.

However, Nokia already has a CDMAone license, is this enough for them to start the manufacture of W-CDMA?

dave