Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Colin Cody who wrote (9447)	10/19/1998 4:24:00 PM
From: WISDOM MILES	Respond to of 19331

I AM GLAD TO TALK TO INTELLIGENT PEOPLE I hope you are one of them. in fact, I became SI MEMBER at first time in my life on OCT.9,1998 before that I read SI BOARD for almost 2-3 years. I respect people who bought DCTC at $2, if there were no buying in last two months, this DCTC would already have been below$0.50. because heavy shorting. when I say don't sell any shares to shorters because DCTC is very cheap now AND I don't think THE SHORTER are really shorting now they are trying to cover now. before they cover, they WANT TO MAKE SURE they couldn't drive shares any lower. shorting a stock has two process: first stage SELL at high, I think it's almost down; SECOND stage, buy at cheap, I think that's THE SHORTER want to do now by buying every shares from shorters and don't sell to SHORTERS now, we are making sure THE SHORTERS couldn't drive DCTC price any more and ONLY LEFT WITH SHORTERS more NAKED SHORT uncovered. with QUIET PERIOD near ending and MORE SOLID NUMBER from the company, we will see a SHORT SQUEESE .and the result will be SHORTERS HAS TO COVER ITS MOST SHORT POSITION AT ABOVE$2 so THE SHORTERS WILL BE in loss(I suppose THE SHORTERS sold most short at$1-$1 3/4) if you are not a shorter, I believe you can see it. best regards wisdom

To: Colin Cody who wrote (9447)	10/19/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: Parker Benchley	Respond to of 19331

Colin, I've always had a problem with someone who is a zealot in either direction and doesn't post a valid email address...ya know? Unless someone is CIA...etc, why would they hide? Personally, I've never taken anyone too seriously who is very pro or con who chooses to stay anonymous. At the very least, it strikes me as rude. It's no different than getting anonymous snail mail. How much credit would you give that? JMHO...... George Bigelow St. Paul, MN gbigelow@pioneeerplanet.infi.net USA Earth (Usually)