SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TENNET who wrote (674)10/19/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: Tom C  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1754
 
TENNET,

Besides the fact that Westergaard has zero credibility on SI. Did you read the financial statements posted by Josef?

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is a development stage company with no significant operating results to date, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with regards to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


Tom

ps: Do you work for or are you in anyway affiliated, or receive compensation from Westergaard or PINC?



To: TENNET who wrote (674)10/20/1998 1:03:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1754
 
Humbly report, TENNET, there will always be those that say "it's white" when I see it's black.

In my humble opinion I've provided all the links necessary for anyone that I consider to have a clear mind to realize exactly who and what Westergaard is - period.

To you he's a saint, to me he's a sinner. For the sake of this thread, how about we just leave it at that? If you wish to discuss Westergaard vs. Pluvia some more, you know where to find that thread.

By all means suspect my motives. You should suspect everyone's motives. I've stated mine here a number of times. You can choose to believe me, or choose to believe that I'm a liar.

I think this stock is a dog. I think it will go down. I wish to say so out loud, and I've said why I think it'll go down, and why I wish to say so.

Am I making myself clear? Are you reading Robert? Have you taken a close look at the financial statements as Tom C. suggested?

Hello, anybody home?

Cheers,

Svejk
proofsheet.com

P.S. Humble thanks, Jeff, wonder who has more chance of success, Symantec or PINC? Duh!



To: TENNET who wrote (674)10/20/1998 6:26:00 AM
From: Westergaard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1754
 
This is really ridiculous, the fantasy that Westergaard Online owed some African charity the $5,000 bounty for uncovering Pluvia. He was uncovered two days before the deadline by another party. His claim for the award is based on an email self identifying himself and claiming the reward which arrived about an hour after the deadline, but that's irrelevant. WE KNEW AT THAT POINT WHO HE WAS.

I never even heard about this African charity until this morning. By introducing this idea that I somehow failed to meet an obligation to starving African children, the Pluvia crowd is employing a Johnny Cochran strategy. One deflects the substance of a discussion by creating a phony issue of morality -- in the OJ case, by making the issue to be Furhman's racism. He may well be a racist, but for that to have become the centerpiece of Cochran's defense simply says what a genius of a lawyer he is.

A year ago these Pluvia people were calling me a nazi and posting pictures of me in an SS uniform. I find this not only amusing but kind of flattering that I could stimulate such strong feelings. Amazing, amazing. I feel badly about those starving African children, by the way. Incidentally, you want to read an interesting book about Africa, check out "Leopold's Ghost" about how the Belgians massacred millions in the Congo at the turn of the century.