Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tomato who wrote (1394)	10/19/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: maintenance	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2251

I made another mistake. I forgot to put the $1500000 G&A in the equation, the NPV per share should be $9.54. The NPV, in this model, is true at the beginning of the year production begins. So no, the price would not appreciate. If we assume that production begins two years from today we would have to further discount for two years or $7.88 per share. The model you have presented is more realistic than my original. I was in error in taxing prior to payback. I taxed too heavy as well. Back to your financing question, if Winspear were to operate the project it is very unlikely they could go with just debt. They would likely get a mix of debt and equity. The debt would almost certainly contain some control. Unfortunately the mix would likely be heavier on the equity side. What is TIA? Cheers