Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (357)	10/20/1998 1:29:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Respond to of 19428

Yes, Kevin just about every thing that JLL said applies today. What a great read that is.

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (357)	10/20/1998 3:50:00 PM
From: Khris Vogel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19428

how many times have you corrected someone on the Yahoo board that erroneously stated that the NYSE listing is a done deal? Off of the top of my head, I can only think of one such posting, and when I questioned the poster on his source, he stated that he had contacts w/ NYSE employees. the move to the NYSE, assuming it's happening, doesn't clear LBOR of any of the allegations against it... So...how would one clear up the allegations to your satisfaction, Kevin? So far co. mgmt. has issued public stmts. there is no truth to them. Arthur Andersen has stated that they, in the course of their audit and review engagements w/ LBOR, witnessed no wrong doings. BDO Seidman before them said the same. But obviously, none of these stmts. are to your satisfaction. So again, how does one provide substantiation that the allegations are false when you won't take any stmts. offered up so far? (Of course, it's my opinion that the majority of the shorts here have their minds made up, and screw anything that tries to shake their beliefs...) ...your followers on the Yahoo board... My followers? You flatter me. But no, I'm not operating a cult of personality like a certain two or three shorts I've previously named in my messages here. The only reason why some people pay attention to what I say is that I have done a lot of research into the co., allowing me to substantiate what I say based on such research. This is in contrast w/ pulling 'facts' out of a hat as per usual here... The biggest problem with your "nothing to see here, move along", is that you have to believe that LBOR was somehow chosen for targeting at random out of the thousands of small stocks out there. Random targetting? You make me laugh...