Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jay Scott who wrote (10315)	10/20/1998 3:53:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

Not to mention the fact that in real life carrying on with a subordinate could be construed as sexual harassment, whether consensual or not. Many believe Clinton's behavior makes him a sexual predator. He used his position of power to obtain sexual favors, some by force, some by intimidation, and some consensual. This is the definition of a sexual predator that is used by NOW and essentially by the courts since the Anita Hill testimony. Bill Vaughn

To: Jay Scott who wrote (10315)	10/20/1998 3:57:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

BTW, Paula Jones "said it was." Apparently that's not good enough. Your test fails. True enough. And the Paula Jones case was thrown out. He should have been tried, and he was tried. I have no problem with that. I have a serious problem with the Monica situation however because I view the predator here as Starr and a bunch of voyeuristic prosecutors. And I do without a doubt believe there was as much or more perversion on the part of the IC than Clinton/Monica.