Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (10324)	10/20/1998 4:12:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

>>But that is not what the law defines as "sexual harassment." Maybe not for Monica but the feminists say that the extreme power differences abrogate consent. Besides, as someone previously averred, other women and men were discriminated against because those that did not perform sex did not get the same sort of preferential treatment - no pentagon jobs, no UN offers. Remember, outside her personal services, Monica was basically inept.

To: jbe who wrote (10324)	10/20/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

jbe and thread, I think there is a majority of opinion here that what went on between Clinton and Lewinsky wasn't sexual harassment. The only reason for the Lewinsky involvement in the Jones suit was to establish a pattern of behavior on BC's part in having sex with subordinates, consentual or otherwise. This is really old stuff.....bp