Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (10385)	10/20/1998 5:20:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The point is that interns who did not blow the president did not get favorable job treatment or offers. What's so hard for you to understand?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (10385)	10/20/1998 9:02:00 PM
From: Jay Scott	Respond to of 67261

Michelle, you really don't see a problem here, do you? Sure, people get jobs all the time through personal connections. It's called "networking." When people use government jobs in return for sexual favors or as a cover up of such behavior, that's called many things, including "cover up," "conspiracy," and in it's simplest form, "sexual harassment." Do you really think all of this government time and resources would have been spent trying to find poor Monica a job if she hadn't already been displaying her talents for the President, who was worried that she might tell someone about it? For those who want to split hairs about whether this is harassment, please enlighten with the legal definition of sexual harassment. Or, at least tell us NOW's definition of this suddenly elusive concept. (Gee, it seemed to have much broader implications during Anita Hill's media run for glory, including "the creation of an uncomfortable work environment." Please. I don't think Clarence ever dropped trou in front of Anita, did he?) JS