Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (10398)	10/20/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

I just think these situations are a little more complicated than people let on. As an example... I would rather have to deal with a hypothetical sexual harasser like Clinton (taking all the claims about him to be true for a moment) vs. someone from the RR. Sure the RR "respects" women right? As long as they are pregnant or stay at home moms that is. I think the RR is afraid of power in women and that to me is scarier than some alleged sexual harasser. Thats the problem with this whole dialogue... theres all these hidden agendas on both sides. This that I mention here is my hidden agenda - I support Clinton because I am afraid of the right wing. I just cant bare the thought of not being self sufficient financially can you? Thats what the RR wants to do to women I think... I wonder what the rights objective is regarding this Clinton situation - a backlash against feminism perhaps? A way to make the feminists look bad? Well theyve certainly achieved that.