Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34265)	10/20/1998 7:58:00 PM
From: The Perfect Hedge	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

MB-- This make sense to you? messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34265)	10/20/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: The Perfect Hedge	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike-- Insiders have been selling in the 30's!(xlnx) cda.com B*

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34265)	10/20/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Look at the ESO part near the bottom: microsoft.com Tom

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (34265)	10/21/1998 5:52:00 AM
From: valueminded	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Mike You must really help me out on this one (IBM) How can they show earnings and have stockholders equity take a hit. My accounting alert starts flashing whenever I see a company report earnings and show a hit to stockholders equity. I see how it can be done by increasing debt to buy back shares thus trading expensive debt financing for cheap equity financing - but it would seem unwise to me to perform such an act unless you were convinced that you were buying back a dollars worth of assets for less than a dollar. What am I missing here ? On another note, how can the tax rate be going down unless there is a future writeoff which would make all things balance - maybe something that hasnt been broached yet. thanks