SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wm sharp who wrote (4481)10/20/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: jean1057  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
are this 206 World wide patents or United States only...and
what would happen if Samsung or Sanyo....or any other company would produce the battery outside the US...how could one enforce the US patents....in Korea, Japan etc...anybody knowledgable about that..????.

BTW we need a CFO........



To: wm sharp who wrote (4481)10/20/1998 11:16:00 PM
From: FMK  Respond to of 27311
 
Nice work Bill- The Manganese Oxide patent is especially
significant, IMO, because it would appear to prevent others from using this low-cost cathode material. Very tough on competition.
If the European community prohibits the use of Cobalt as an environmental hazard as I have heard is a definite possibility, those with rights to alternative cathode materials will have a unique advantage there, as the industry-standard 18650 cylindrical canister-type cells use cobalt-oxide.



To: wm sharp who wrote (4481)10/21/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Gordon Quickstad  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
The electrically conductive adhesion promoters may be a key patent also. With thin laminates and no exterior structure or rolled configuration to keep the laminates in intimate contact, adhesion must be (have been?) a major milestone.