SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clarksterh who wrote (16826)10/21/1998 8:29:00 AM
From: Rajala  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 152472
 
>>WLL(cdmaOne version, of course) may have capacity advantage of 6X
>>over mobile, not 2X Clark previously estimated.

>Well 4 or 5 times
>anyway (three times the number of users per base station plus
>30%(estimated) fewer basestations because the decreased mobility
>decreases the excess capacity needed in case users cluster).

Oh dear.

First of all, let's remember where the 3 x capacity advantage for WLL is supposed to come from: the reduced non-traffic signalling, such as power control etc. which is estimated to take 2/3 of CDMA1 capacity (!) when it takes only between 1/8 and 1/16 of GSM capacity. We are talking about the same basic functions, nicht wahr? Do we all accept that CDMA1 eats bandwidth like a lewinsky with 10 x more inefficient signalling than GSM?

Secondly, the 30% (estimated) fewer basestations because of decreased mobility is not applicable. People expect much more availability from their fixed phone than their mobile, thus there's no need for that extra 30% in price comparison.

Thirdly, as I have stated before and someone even supported this (which does not happen too often to my opinions on this thread I might add), capacity is not a cost issue on WLL. If you get enough subscribers to exceed the max available channel potential (120 channels, that would be maybe 1000-3000 subscribers since people talk only every now and then) of a standard CDMA1 cell, you are talking about a freak case.

- rajala