Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6782)	10/21/1998 8:35:00 AM
From: Babe' Boua	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike, Where in the heck were you Monday? We sure could have used you during the Q&A session. WOW!!! babe'

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6782)	10/21/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: J. Nelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike: That (IMO.) is a list that should be E-Mailed to the H.Q. of MIDN, for full ansewers and posted here to settle some of the on going questions over this full topic. Ah you could leave off the one on JJ, yet that may be the reason for some of the rest did not go as we found out she would be a no show...lol... Please do send it to them and see what can become of the full fact on that and othere issues still open IMO... My only question to add is, was Mr Price going to Utah after the AGM? j.

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6782)	10/21/1998 9:33:00 AM
From: sunset	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

with all that questioning.my advice is to jump aboard medinah or npec.right away .today

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6782)	10/21/1998 10:38:00 AM
From: Handshake™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Well Mike let me take issue with NUMBER 18 first....You should know by now that my honesty is probably one of my only virtues, so the answer is YES! But don't forget about my buddy Madeleine! Contrary to what Gary might tell you I AM attracted to women...lol! :-) P.S. Great questions!, I'll get you some answers shortly Vinman

To: Mike Gold who wrote (6782)	10/24/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: Handshake™	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

Mike's questions answered....Mike Les did respond to the questions, I will relay those to you verbatim. In case I skip one its because I don't understand his response or do not feel comfortable being the messenger. We'll clarify any of those later. 1. Combination of cash and securities ....(Mike Les said there would be more to come on this later...) 2. All majors are covered with non-disclosure agreements as to specific items, but we can release information as to expressions of interest in non-promotional releases - i.e. yes, they visited the property and confirmed the work that is being done. We have never stated, until Monday, that Asarco or any other major was down there - other people did that. a) No one ever pays a major to visit a property! Majors have their own agenda and monitor developments looking for opportunities all over the world. The more exposure we get from majors, the better our position becomes when we negotiate final agreements. b) All data produced from the property has been shared with Asarco pursuant to our agreement. Independent of us, their geologists have conducted their own investigation and verifications and concur that our data as presented and developed, is professional and acceptable to them. We have had two other majors do likewise subsequent to Asarco and I will be meeting with the fourth major next week. We will then enter negotiations to see which agreement best meets our needs, if any, or make a decision to continue further on our own before making a commitment. 3) As discussed, we do not pay majors. We will disclose their recommendations when we receive same. 4) We have disclosed the claim identification on each project purchased. We have no fear from any major that has a signed agreement with us as most majors are honourable. We are only concerned about unscrupulous opportunist who might take advantage of an opportunity to obtain properties before we have finalized agreements with the properties that we require. This process is fluid from day to day as results are forthcoming and the agreements are amended from time to time to include/delete properties. 5) Dayton - proceeding on all fronts. We do not control the court's timeframe and can only comment that we anticipate this will conclude quickly. 6) N/C (folks #6 was directed at me, and Ian read what is now posted at the offical Medinah website. Gordon's reports is exactly what was read at the agm. I may not be ignorant Mike but I do have that CRS disease. (Can't remember sht...now go give that red headed girl friend a big 'ol kiss) 7) No drills will turn until completion and interpretation of all data being developed. Because of the filed results to date, the IP program has been expanded with continuing, encouraging results. The interpretation of the data is critical to a successful drill program, which is being done to assess the value of the deposit - not to run a market. 8) We were overly optimistic about the startup of production of the Placer. The gross acreage involved and the volume of material warrents an intensive examination to maximize the profit return. The delivery of the equipment from Costa Rica and Vancouver took longer than anticipated and customs clearance was also painful, but finally accomplished. We submitted all the data to Baxter Mining for a recommendation of where, when, and what was required to proceed profitably. Baxter has now identified the additional processing equipment that is required and has resourced the availability and associated costs. Clarence has been working with Baxter on a daily basis and will be in my office on Thursday, at which time we will have a firm timeline and budget all costs. We have also received an expression of interest on the entire Placer project from an international consortium who spent six weeks assessing the properties. 9) Andacollo. An intelligent approach is to make an agreement with Dayton regarding all the claims located within the Dayton mining area and develop the other properties (the majority) in keeping with the ACA Howe recommendations. 10) N/A (Mike the only thing I remember a few times is that management will always study all options) 11) We are proceeding forthwith on this front - translations are now underway on the Chilean audits. 12) Being negotiated 13) Ralph ?? (mike, Ralph wasn't there and I have already chastised that %#^%$$^ &&^* &** for not being there. He had personal reasons and I completely understand. You will know soon enough why!) 14) Premature 15) See the updated website this week 16) We did not discuss shorts, which are a normal function of the marketm but we do strongly recommend share registration. We heard the recommendations for a name change, that I personally support. 17) Why is this an issue?. ( Mike, I'll put her up there with Barbara Bush. Just as sweet, and loving as they come. To be honest, It was Mr. & Mrs. Paul Jones that put the icing on the cake for me. Just a great loving couple. You would think they would be from the South with all that warmth, and caring. But hey we can't always have a monopoly ) 18) Would you please disclose all about Janet J. to me?? ----------------------------------------------- Well folks those are the answers. I'm sorry if I mistyped and will correct as I find. But this is verbatim what Les had to say. I did add my comments in parenthesis. As far as #18 goes, you guys just stay away from my fantasy ladies (Jane J & Madly), a guy my age and looks doesn't need for them to find out I'm short, fat, and balding rather precipitously, sooooo shhhhhhhhhhhh!. LOL!!!! Thank you Les for taking the time to answer. Folks remember, there are somethings we just don't want the enemies to find out, so let these guys go build our asset base and our stock price!!!!!! :-)