Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jach who wrote (18334)	10/21/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Charlie Schultz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77397

Yes and I have a feeling that it may drag SAP down a bit. Whats your feeling? Charlie

To: jach who wrote (18334)	10/21/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77397

Like PSFT, a possible warning like this will not be good for csco. Reporting a dollar loss wouldn't be good for Cisco either. What's either got to do with reality?

To: jach who wrote (18334)	10/21/1998 1:06:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 77397

Look Jach, You're obviously not respected here. So, why don't you go away? Please? OG

To: jach who wrote (18334)	10/22/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Bong Lewis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77397

"Like PSFT, a possible warning like this will not be good for csco." you are comparing apple with orange, again. this is a selective market. only the true leaders could go up regardless of PE. I think you wishing to buy csco at a better price like tom kulat (what ever) wanted to buy intel at 65. it's not too late to pay a higher price for a quality stock than to pay for a cheap stock with bad prospect. That's why Chicago wouldnt mind to pay MICHAEL Jordan the most because he is the best.