Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (9157)	10/21/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Have you looked at FAMH recently? What Pugs posted was wrong, again. To: +TopCat (18965 ) From: +Pugs Saturday, May 23 1998 2:09PM ET Reply # of 25153 In response, A friend of mine is long FAMH, he noticed a certain individual posting here and asked me my opinion of FAMH and the reasons this individual, who is also not a shareholder, is posting negative remarks about FAMH. It became clear to me, observing the players, the strategical tactics, the smear campaign, the common drudgery of threats of SEC investigations, dilution of shares, misrepresentations to who certain individuals actually were, etc., etc. that some interests are very short and hard at work shaking shares. I would tell this to any investor in a BB stock...there are accomplices of shortsellers working these threads on behalf of their naked short positions. I have also been contacted by several FAMH investors since I started posting here asking me to post more often. Also notice I say to do your own diligence, I'm not qualified to give advice about FAMH, I can give my opinion that FAMH is being manipulated heavily because all the indicators are there. I suggest that if shareholders have done diligence and are satisfied that a FAMH investment is a worthy one, then DO NOT PATRONIZE the dump & pump artists who work these threads relentlessly with the sole purpose of tanking your long investment. Pugs Once again Pugs was wrong. It is the company...