Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (39767)	10/21/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578501

Engel, You really ARE easy. I put that "stupor" thing in there just for you and you bit, just like a largemouth bASS. <G> Where did you get the idea I sold any Intel? Sorry Charlie. Jim

To: Paul Engel who wrote (39767)	10/21/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578501

Paul, Look down near the bottom of this page where it says AMD LAST TRADE to see who is REALLY in a stupor. AMD 17 3/8 +1/4 1,167,400 It's not looking all that stupid, Paul. You are up about 15% in 2 weeks on your AMD investment. Scumbria

To: Paul Engel who wrote (39767)	10/21/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: kash johal	Respond to of 1578501

Pauleronazi, >Re: McMannis - Re: "Intel seems to be in a stupor, not knowing >whether to attack the K6-2, K6-3 or the K7... " >Look down near the bottom of this page where it says AMD LAST >TRADE to see who is REALLY in a stupor. >You shudda kept those Intel shares and dumped the AMD, Jimmy - >you'd be ahead of the game instead of further and further and >deeper in losses. >Did you graduate from the "Fuchi School of Investing" ? >I can't imagine why AMD is sending all its Super Double Secret >Pwivate Inside Information to lowly Jim McMannis which is doing >them no good at all. >Tell you Super Double Secret Inside Source to copy Tom Kurlak or >CNBC on his "Inside Information for Jim McMannis Only" e-mails. >Paul Hey are you attacking the messenger again. THE QUESTION WAS INTEL DOEN'T KNOW HOW TO RESPOND TO NEW SPEED GRADES etc. NOT: about todays stock price. NOT: about your lying about Jims stock trades. NOT: about your comments on where Jim graduated from. NOT: about the double secret thwead you are so worried about. Don't lie on this thread scumbag! Tell us about how Intel is going to counter the new speed grades this quarter. Also, please post those Katmai benchmarks. hugs and kisses, Kash